My name is Rodrigo Arrangoiz I am a breast surgeon/ thyroid surgeon / parathyroid surgeon / head and neck surgeon / surgical oncologist that works at Center for Advanced Surgical Oncology in Miami, Florida.
I was trained as a surgeon at Michigan State University from (2005 to 2010) where I was a chief resident in 2010. My surgical oncology and head and neck training was performed at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia from 2010 to 2012. At the same time I underwent a masters in science (Clinical research for health professionals) at the University of Drexel. Through the International Federation of Head and Neck Societies / Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center I performed a two year head and neck surgery and oncology / endocrine fellowship that ended in 2016.
Mi nombre es Rodrigo Arrangoiz, soy cirujano oncólogo / cirujano de tumores de cabeza y cuello / cirujano endocrino que trabaja Center for Advanced Surgical Oncology en Miami, Florida.
Fui entrenado como cirujano en Michigan State University (2005 a 2010 ) donde fui jefe de residentes en 2010. Mi formación en oncología quirúrgica y e n tumores de cabeza y cuello se realizó en el Fox Chase Cancer Center en Filadelfia de 2010 a 2012. Al mismo tiempo, me sometí a una maestría en ciencias (investigación clínica para profesionales de la salud) en la Universidad de Drexel. A través de la Federación Internacional de Sociedades de Cabeza y Cuello / Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center realicé una sub especialidad en cirugía de cabeza y cuello / cirugia endocrina de dos años que terminó en 2016.
Standard excision using wider margins with linear or delayed repair with standard reexcision
Mohs Mircrographic surgery (MMS)
Resection with complete circumferential peripheral and deep margen assessment (CCPDMA)
RT for nonsurgical candidates
Patients treated with MMS or resection with CCPDMA should receive adjuvant radiation if clear margins cannot be achieved
Recommended adjuvant therapy options include:
Radiation and/or multidisciplinary consultation:
To consider systemic therapy with a hedgehog pathway inhibitor or involvement in a clinical trial:
In select cases, hedgehog inhibitors can be considered in a neoadjuvant fashion if there is a potential benefit of decreasing the lesion to spare surgical morbidity, as demonstrated here
Adjuvant RT is recommended for patients with negative margins after surgery:
But with large nerve or extensive perineural involvement
Basal cell carcinoma before (a) and after (b) treatment with the neoadjuvant hedgehog inhibitor
Was a 4-arm, prospective, multicenter cohort study:
Of 1,737 patients:
That evaluated the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for invasive breast cancer
Clinical node status:
Was determined by palpation and ultrasound in all patients
Ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration or core biopsy:
Was recommended but not mandatory
Patients with clinically node-negative (cN-) disease:
Underwent SLNB before NAC (Arm A)
If the sentinel node (SN) was positive:
A second SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed after NAC (Arm B)
Women who were clinically node positive (cN+) underwent NAC, and those who converted to being cN- also had SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (Arm C)
Only patients whose clinical nodal status remained positive (ycN1) underwent axillary dissection without sentinel lymph node biopsy (arm D)
When SLNB was done before NAC:
No difference in the detection rate was found between the combined (radiocolloid and blue dye) and single agent (radiocolloid alone) detection techniques:
99.5% vs. 98.8%
However, when SLNB was done after NAC:
The addition of blue dye increased the detection rate and the number of nodes retrieved
Dual tracer detection rate was:
76% after chemotherapy in patients who also had SLNB prior to chemotherapy and 88% in those who converted from cN+ to cN- with NAC and had only one SLNB
For patients who were confirmed node positive by SLNB biopsy prior to NAC:
The FNR of repeat SLNB after NAC was 51.6%
For patients who converted from cN+ to cN- with NAC:
FNR of SLNB after NAC was 14.2%:
However, in the cN+ to cN- group:
The FNR was below 10%, for patients who had 3 or more lymph nodes removed and if both blue dye and radiocolloid were used
In these cases, the FNR was 8.6%
References
Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol.2013;14(7):609-618.
Schwentner L, Helms G, Nekljudova V, Ataseven B, Bauerfeind I, Ditsch N, et al. Using ultrasound and palpation for predicting axillary lymph node status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy – Results from the multi-center SENTINA trial. Breast. 2017;31:202-207.
There was a significant decrease in the cumulative incidence of all local recurrence as first events:
In the two groups treated with docetaxel:
Approximately half of which was accounted for by ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences in women treated with breast-conserving therapy
References
1. Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, Geyer Jr CE, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J ClinOncol. 2006;24(13):2019-2027.
2. NSABP clinical trials overview. Protocol B-27. A randomized trial comparing preoperative doxorubicin (adriamycin) cyclophosphamide (AC) to preoperative AC followed by preoperative docetaxel (taxotere) and to preoperative ac followed by postoperative docetaxel in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project website. http://www.nsabp.pitt.edu/B-27.asp. Accessed May 15, 2020.
Is a phase 3 randomized clinical trial currently accruing patients:
The trial is designed to evaluate the role of regional nodal radiotherapy (RT) in patients who had documented positive axillary lymph nodes prior to undergoing NAC who subsequently convert to pathologically negative axillary nodes after the administration of NAC
The primary endpoint:
Is to determine if regional nodal RT significantly reduces the rate of in-breast cancer recurrence free interval
Node positivity:
Will be documented by either FNA or core needle biopsy prior to the administration of NAC
Patients will undergo standard NAC with the addition of anti-HER2 therapy for patients with HER2-positive tumors
Patients can have either mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy:
Mastectomy patients will be randomized to either no RT or regional nodal RT and chest wall RT
Breast conservation patients will be randomized to either whole-breast RT or whole-breast RT plus regional nodal RT
A companion trial is being undertaken by The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology:
The A11202 trial is enrolling patients that were axillary node positive prior to NAC, have a normal axilla on physical exam after NAC, but have microscopic disease on sentinel lymph node biopsy:
This trial randomizes patients to completion axillary node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy only in addition to radiation therapy for both arms
References
1. NSABP clinical trials overview. Protocol B-27. A randomized trial comparing preoperative doxorubicin (adriamycin) cyclophosphamide (ac) to preoperative ac followed by preoperative docetaxel (taxotere) and to preoperative ac followed by postoperative docetaxel in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project website. http://www.nsabp.pitt.edu/b-51.asp. Accessed May 15, 2020.
3. Comparison of axillary lymph node dissection with axillary radiation for patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with chemotherapy. NIH ClinicalTrials.gov website. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01901094. Accessed May 15, 2020.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) constitute the majority of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs):
Which are also referred to as “keratinocyte cancer”
Keratinocyte cancer:
Represents about 95% of malignant skin tumors estimated at greater than 5.8 million cases annually
While BCC (3.6 million cases annually) is four to five times more common than SCC (1.8 million cases annually):
The incidence of both tumor types continues to rise despite growing awareness of the risk factors for these skin cancers
The overall incidence increases with age:
Is known to be higher in men than in women
Development of NMSC is multifactorial and is related to various genotypic, phenotypic, and environmental risk factors:
Ultraviolet (UV) solar radiation:
Is considered to be the dominant risk factor for the development of both BCC and SCC:
Supported by the fact that most of these tumors tend to present on sun-exposed areas of the body
The development of BCC is thought to arise from intense intermittent sun exposure:
Leading to burns
Whereas SCC appears to be linked to the cumulative dose of UV solar radiation over time
Sun exposure earlier in life appears to be more influential in skin cancer development than that received later in life
Markers of UV sensitivity (e.g., fair skin, light eyes, blond or red hair) and intensity of exposure (i.e., increased incidence for individuals living in proximity to the equator):
Are associated with increased NMSC risk as is additional UV exposure from recreational tanning booths and UV light therapy:
One case-controlled study demonstrated that the use of tanning devices was associated with an estimated twofold risk for both SCC (odds ratio = 2.5) and BCC (odds ratio = 1.5)
Karagas et al. reported that treatment of psoriasis with oral psoralen in combination with light treatment (PUVA therapy) resulted in an increased adjusted relative risk of 8.6 for SCC while the risk for BCC was much lower
UV-induced mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene is thought to be a common event in NMSC development
Another important risk factor for both BCC and SCC:
Is immunosuppression:
Long-term immunosuppression therapy such as that used for solid organ transplant has been shown to increase the risk of SCC over 100-fold and for BCC about 10-fold
SCC in immunosuppressed patients tend to be behave more aggressively and are associated with greater tumor depth, higher risk of recurrence, and more frequently associated with perineural or lymphovascular invasion:
However, BCCs have not been found to be more aggressive in solid organ transplant recipients than the general population
Patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome also have an increased incidence of NMSC, and factors such as persistent human papilloma virus (HPV) infection may act synergistically with UV exposure to increase risk:
Moreover, HPV infection, especially HPV 16 and 18, has been implicated in the development of anogenital SCC
Exposure to ionizing radiation:
Increases the risk of NMSC threefold and often presents decades after initial exposure
This risk has been shown to be dose dependent
Chemical exposures:
Such as arsenic, tar, soot, tobacco, asphalt, and mineral oil:
Have all been associated with an increased risk of SCC
SCC can also arise from areas of chronic inflammation and healing such as from:
Scars, burn sites, or ulcers:
This type of SCC is also known as a Marjolin ulcer
Patients with genetic syndromes including:
Xeroderma pigmentosum, albinism, Muir–Torre syndrome, dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, Fanconi anemia, Werner syndrome, nevoid basal cell syndrome, and Li–Fraumeni syndrome have an increased incidence of NMSC:
Xeroderma pigmentosum:
Is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by:
Photophobia, severe sun sensitivity, and advanced sun damage:
Affected individuals have defective DNA excision repair, and when exposed to UV radiation, develop malignancies of the skin and eyes at a rate 1,000 times that of the general population
Aggressive sun protection in the form of full-body sun suits and regular skin examinations are critical for patients with xeroderma pigmentosum
Ideally, these patients should only go outside at night
Nevoid basal cell syndrome:
Is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the development of multiple BCCs:
BCCs in patients with nevoid basal cell syndrome are often quite small but can number in the hundreds on any given skin surface
The sonic hedgehog signaling pathway (PTCH1 gene, chromosome 9q):
Has been recognized as having a significant etiologic role in nevoid BCC syndrome, and is also present in 90% of sporadic BCC
These patients are exquisitely sensitive to radiation and should avoid excessive sun exposure and radiation therapy
Regular follow-up is important, as such tumors are difficult to monitor and treat
Similar to other tumor types, a previous diagnosis of cutaneous carcinoma:
Increases the risk of future NMSCs to as high as 35% at 3 years and 50% at 5 years