Molecular Basis of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

  • Carcinoid tumors arise from:
    • The enterochromaffin cells:
      • Which are neuroendocrine cells:
        • That contain serotonin
    • In the small bowel:
      • These cells reside within the epithelium
  • The pathogenesis of small bowel carcinoids is poorly understood:
    • Risk factors include:
      • Family history of cancer
      • Elevated body mass index
      • Diabetes
    • Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes:
      • Are associated with an elevated incidence of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors:
        • But no other known familial disorders are implicated in small bowel carcinoid tumors

#Arrangoiz #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #Teacher #Surgeon

RTOG 9804

👉The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9804 trial evaluated the impact of RT after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in patients with mammographically detected low-risk DCIS as defined by size <2.5 cm, unicentricity, low- and intermediate-grade, and margins >3 mm.

👉Data were analyzed after a median follow-up of 7.17 years in 636 patients randomly assigned to either RT or observation after BCT.

👉The primary endpoint of ipsilateral local failure was 0.9% in the RT arm versus 6.7% in the observation arm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

👉This prospective randomized trial (1998 to 2006) in women with mammographically detected low- or intermediate-grade DCIS, measuring less than 2.5 cm with margins ≥ 3 mm, compared RT with observation after surgery.

👉The study was designed for 1,790 patients but was closed early because of lower than projected accrual.

👉Six hundred thirty-six patients from the United States and Canada were entered; tamoxifen use (62%) was optional.

👉Ipsilateral local failure (LF) was the primary end point; LF and contralateral failure were estimated using cumulative incidence, and overall and disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

👉Median follow-up time was 7.17 years (range, 0.01 to 11.33 years).

👉Two LFs occurred in the RT arm, and 19 occurred in the observation arm.

👉At 7 years, the LF rate was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.0% to 2.2%) in the RT arm versus 6.7% (95% CI, 3.2% to 9.6%) in the observation arm (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.47; P < .001).

👉Grade 1 to 2 acute toxicities occurred in 30% and 76% of patients in the observation and RT arms, respectively; grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in 4.0% and 4.2% of patients, respectively.

👉Late RT toxicity was grade 1 in 30%, grade 2 in 4.6%, and grade 3 in 0.7% of patients.

CONCLUSION

👉In this good-risk subset of patients with DCIS, with a median follow-up of 7 years, the LF rate was low with observation but was decreased significantly with the addition of RT. Longer follow-up is planned because the timeline for LF in this setting seems protracted.

#Arrangoiz #BreastSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #BreastCancer

Risk Stratification in Highly SuspiciousThyroid Nodules or CytologicallyConfirmed Primary PapillaryThyroid Cancer

👉Risk stratification begins immediately upon identification of a suspicious thyroid nodule.

👉In the absence of a validated peri-diagnostic risk-stratification system, we use a clinical framework that incorporates tumor imaging characteristics, medical team characteristics, and patient preferences to risk stratify patients as ideal, appropriate, or inappropriate for minimalistic initial management options, such as active surveillance or thyroid lobectomy.

👉This clinical framework
address the key factors that differentiate actionable from non-actionable disease.

#Arrangoiz #ThyroidSurgeon #ThyroidExpert #CancerSurgeon #HeadandNeckSurgeon #ThyroidNodules #ThyroidCancer #SurgicalOncologist

Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in-situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853—a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group

Nina Bijker, Philip Meijnen, Johannes L Peterse, Jan Bogaerts, Irène Van Hoorebeeck, Jean-Pierre Julien, Massimiliano Gennaro, Philippe Rouanet, Antoine Avril, Ian S Fentiman, Harry Bartelink, Emiel J Th RutgersJournal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 July 20, 24 (21): 3381-7

PURPOSE

👉The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer conducted a randomized trial investigating the role of radiotherapy (RT) after local excision (LE) of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) of the breast. They analyzed the efficacy of RT with 10 years follow-up on both the overall risk of local recurrence (LR) and related to clinical, histologic, and treatment factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

👉After complete LE, women with DCIS were randomly assigned to no further treatment or RT (50 Gy).

👉One thousand ten women with mostly (71%) mammographically detected DCIS were included.

👉The median follow-up was 10.5 years.

RESULTS

👉The 10-year LR-free rate was 74% in the group treated with LE alone compared with 85% in the women treated by LE plus RT (log-rank P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53).

👉The risk of DCIS and invasive LR was reduced by 48% (P = .0011) and 42% (P = .0065) respectively.

👉Both groups had similar low risks of metastases and death.

👉At multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with an increased LR risk were young age (< or = 40 years; HR = 1.89), symptomatic detection (HR = 1.55), intermediately or poorly differentiated DCIS (as opposed to well-differentiated DCIS; HR = 1.85 and HR = 1.61 respectively), cribriform or solid growth pattern (as opposed to clinging/micropapillary subtypes; HR = 2.39 and HR = 2.25 respectively), doubtful margins (HR = 1.84), and treatment by LE alone (HR = 1.82).

👉The effect of RT was homogeneous across all assessed risk factors.

CONCLUSION

👉With long-term follow-up, RT after LE for DCIS continued to reduce the risk of LR, with a 47% reduction at 10 years. All patient subgroups benefited from RT.

#Arrangoiz #BreastSurgeon #BreastCancer #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist

Carcinoid Tumors / Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Small Bowel – Etiology / Pathogenesis

 

  • Carcinoid tumors are classically defined as:
    • Well-differentiated:
      • Low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors:
        • Traditionally:
          • High-grade or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are classified as:
            • Neuroendocrine carcinomas:
              • Although many refer to any small bowel neuroendocrine tumor as:
                • A carcinoid tumor:
                  • Which is the term I favor
  • Carcinoid tumors:
    • Arise most commonly from:
      • The gastrointestinal (GI) tract:
        • But can also arise in the:
          • Lungs
        • Other rare additional sites:
          • Such as the genitourinary system
    • Within the GI tract:
      • Carcinoid tumors most commonly arise from the:
        • Small bowel (45%)
        • Rectum (20%)
        • Appendix (17%):
          • This data is based on a Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database report from 1973 to 1997:
            • Although rectal carcinoids are becoming more common:
              • Since the advent of screening colonoscopy
    • Epidemiology:
      • The annual incidence of newly diagnosed small bowel carcinoid tumors:
        • Is 9.3 per million:
          • Although the true incidence may be higher based on postmortem studies
      • However, the significance of early-stage and extremely low-grade preclinical carcinoid tumors is:
        • Unknown
      • Carcinoid tumors are:
        • The most common small bowel malignancies:
          • Slightly more common than adenocarcinomas:
            • 37.4% versus 36.9%
        • Their incidence has been rising by:
          • An average of 3.6% annually:
            • Over the past 30 years
      • They are slightly more common in men than in women:
        • 52% versus 48%
      • Te median age at diagnosis is:
        • 66

#Arrangoiz #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #Teacher #Surgeon #CancerExpert

Predicting Survival Outcomes in Thyroid Cancer: The UpdatedAJCC/TNM Staging System

👉In October 2016, the AJCC (www.cancerstaging.org)
published the eighth edition of the AJCC / TNM cancer staging system, which replaced the seventh edition that had been used by clinicians, cancer registries, and researchers since 2009.

👉On the 1st of January 2018, tumor registries officially began using the eighth edition for tumor staging.

👉Whereas the staging tables for medullary
thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer
showed
only minimal changes,
the rules for the staging of well differentiated thyroid cancer underwent substantial modifications.

👉These included the following:

  • An increase of the age cutoff from 45 years to 55 years of age at diagnosis
  • Removal of microscopic extrathyroidal extension as a key component of the staging system
  • No longer mandating assignment of stage III to older patients with microscopic extrathyroidal extension or lymph node metastases
  • Establishment of a new T3b category for tumors of any size that demonstrate gross extrathyroidal extension involving only the surrounding strap muscles

👉The AJCC Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Committee
carefully considered the possibility of inclusion of mo-
lecular markers
(specifically, BRAFV600E and TERT
promoter mutations
) in the AJCC prognostic staging
definitions.

👉Whereas both of these mutations, particularly when present together, have been shown to be predictors of poor clinical outcomes, they appeared to add only marginal benefit to the traditional anatomic staging factors.

👉Thus, molecular characterization of differentiated thyroid cancers, although providing some prognostic information, were not powerful enough factors to merit upstaging tumors to prognostic stages above those mandated by TNM risk factors.

👉Nonetheless, similar to the approach used in the
ATA risk-stratification system
, molecular results can be used to refine further and individualize risk within risk categories or stages.

👉The three critical factors that determine the prognostic stage groups of the eighth edition AJCC / TNM cancer staging system include the age at diagnosis, the presence or absence of distant metastases, and the presence or absence of gross extrathyroidal extension.

👉Rather than the use of the standard TNM staging tables provided in the AJCC / TNM manual, I find it
easier to use the flow diagram used by MSKCC to stage patients rapidly based on the key clinical risk factors (age at diagnosis, distant metastasis, gross extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastases).

A simplified approach to AJCC staging in differentiated thyroid cancer, emphasizing the critical decision factors, which include age at
diagnosis, distant metastasis, and gross extrathyroidal extensions.

👉In patients age under 55 years, this figure rapidly classifies patients as either stage I (any T, any N, M0) or stage II (any T, any N, M1).

👉In the older patients (55 years or older), additional factors, such as the presence or absence of distant metastasis, invasion of strap muscles, and extent of gross extrathyroidal extension, are also used to define the prognostic stage groups.

👉In the eighth edition of the AJCC / TNM cancer staging system, it was anticipated that the majority of patients would be classified as stage I or stage II, reflecting the excellent outcomes expected in the majority of thyroid cancer patients.

👉A smaller number of patients, particularly the
older patients with either distant metastases or gross extrathyroidal extension, were anticipated to do worse and are therefore classified as stage III or IV.

👉Multiple publications have demonstrated that the
eighth edition of the AJCC / TNM cancer staging system
moved a substantial number of patients into lower
prognostic stage groups
without affecting the overall
survival of those lower-stage groups
.

👉The patients who remained in the higher-stage groups had poorer prognoses, as expected.

👉This resulted in a much better separation of the four prognostic stage groups with respect to survival, such that 5- to 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was:

  • 99% in stage I patients
  • 88% to 97% in stage II patients
  • 72% to 85% in stage III patients
  • 67% to 72% in stage IV patients

👉Unlike previous editions of the AJCC / TNM staging
system in which there was substantial overlap in survival in patients with stage I, II, and III disease, the eighth edition provides meaningful separation among the prognostic stage groups that appear to be clinically relevant.

👉The differences in predicted and published 10-year survival rates are best seen when analyzed
based on age group
(age less than 55 years vs age equal or greater than 55 years) as shown below.

Ten-year median DSS estimates approximated from data extrapolated from publications examining eighth edition AJCC prognostic stages.

👉The predicted 10-year DSS has been validated for all age and stage groups, with only the younger (age less than 55 years) stage II patients appearing to do more poorly than anticipated.

👉The lower-than-anticipated 10-year DSS in the younger patients (age less than 55 years) with stage II disease was the result of the stage migration of patients in the 45- to 55-year age
group from seventh edition AJCC stage IV to eighth
edition AJCC stage II.

#Arrangoiz #ThyroidSurgeon #ThyroidExpert #ThyroidCancer #HeadandNeckSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist

Which mapping agent(s) produces the highest sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate?

👉Krag et al. first described using technetium-99m sulfur colloid in sentinel node (SN) mapping and noted that he attained an SN identification rate of 98%, with a false-negative rate of 11%.

👉Technetium-99m sulfur colloid is the most widely used radioisotope for lymphatic mapping in the United States.

👉In Europe, technetium-99m colloid albumin is used most often.

👉Similarly, Giuliano et al. described the use of isosulfan blue dye, with a SN detection rate of 98%, without false-negative nodes.

👉Anaphylaxis and hypotension also have been reported as adverse events when using isosulfan blue dye.

👉Overall, isosulfan blue dye is the most commonly used dye for the lymphatic mapping of breast cancer.

👉The SN detection rate using methylene blue has been described as 93%, and concordance with radioisotope was described in 95% of patients.

👉Although methylene blue is available at a lower cost when compared to isosulfan blue, it must be injected carefully into the subcutaneous tissues.

👉Injection into the dermis may lead to epidermolysis and necrosis.

👉Therefore when used, methylene blue should be diluted with saline to minimize these complications (eg, 1 ml of 1% methylene blue diluted with 2 to 3 ml of injectable saline) and injected in the subareolar breast parenchyma deep to the skin.

👉The combination of blue dye and radioisotope improves the SN detection rate as first described by Albertini and colleagues.

👉As a result, several other studies have demonstrated similar findings and, thus, dual-agent lymphatic mapping has been accepted universally as a better method in the detection of the SN.

👉The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 used radioisotope and blue dye for the detection of SLNs.

👉Sentinel nodes were identified by blue dye alone in 5.1%, by radioisotope alone in 24.3% and by both tracers in 65.1% of patients.

👉The reported SLN identification rate was 97% with a 9.8% false-negative rate.

The most common adverse events were allergic reactions.

👉Anaphylaxis was also reported as an adverse event.

REFERENCES

  1. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA. 1996;276:1818-1822.
  2. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:391-401.
  3. Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node sampling in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 2006;106:4-16.
  4. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:927-933.
  5. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol. 1993;2:335-339.
  6. Newman LA, Newman EA. Lymphatic mapping techniques and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Surg Clin N Am. 2007;87:353-364.
  7. Simmons RM, Smith SM, Osborne MP. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel lymph node localization. Breast J. 2001;7:181-183.
  8. Simmons R, Thevarajah S, Brennan M, Christos P, Osborne M. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel node localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:242-247.
  9. Zakaria S, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC. Safety and technical success of methylene blue dye for lymphatic mapping in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;196:228-233.

#Arrangoiz #BreastSurgeon #BreastSurgeon

NSABP B-17

👉The NSABP B-17, Phase III Randomized Study of Postoperative Radiotherapy Following Segmental Mastectomy and Axillary Dissection in Patients with Noninvasive Intraductal Adenocarcinoma of the Breast

👉Compared lumpectomy alone to lumpectomy plus breast irradiation in 818 patients with localized ductal carcinoma in situ.

👉This trial concluded that radiotherapy did not improve OS but that it did significantly decrease the rate of invasive or in situ in breast tumor recurrence in the ipsilateral breast.

#Arrangoiz #BreastSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #BreastCancer #SurgicalOncologist

ACOSOG Z0011 Trial

👉Data from the ACOSOG Z0011 trial suggests completion axillary dissection can be avoided for small cancers with clinically node-negative, sentinel node (SN)-positive disease, provided that systemic therapy and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are incorporated into the treatment strategy for early-stage breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

👉This trial took clinically node-negative patients with 1 to 2 positive SNs by hematoxylin and eosin staining who were treated with BCS and whole-breast irradiation and assigned them into 1 of 2 arms:

👉One that received completion ALND versus the other that received only SLNB.

👉The 10-year overall survival in the SLNB only group versus the completion ALND group was 86.3% and 83.6%, respectively.

👉Similarly, disease-free survival was 80.2% and 78.2%, respectively.

👉The study demonstrated that the 10-year in-breast recurrence rate was higher in the ALND group, 5.6% versus 3.8% (P=0.13) than in the sentinel lymph node resection only group.

👉Regional recurrence occurred in less than 1.5% of patients in both arms.

REFERENCES

  1. Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:426-432.

#Arrangoiz #BreastSurgeon #BreastCancer #CancerSurgeon

EORTC Trial 10801

👉The EORTC Trial 10801 was a randomized multicenter trial that compared breast-conserving therapy with MRM for patients with invasive breast cancer less than 5 cm in diameter.

👉At 10 years, there was no difference between the two groups in OS or in distant metastasis-free rates.

👉Locoregional recurrence at 10 years was 12% for the mastectomy group and 20% for the breast-conserving therapy group.

#Arrangoiz #BreastCancer #BreastSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist