Capecitabine and Early Breast Cancer

👉Capecitabine is often used to treat breast cancer, but the best use of capecitabine is open for discussion.

👉According to a large meta-analysis of the effects of capecitabine in early breast cancer, capecitabine improves disease-free and overall survival for patients with triple-negative breast cancer, but only when it is added to other systemic therapies and not when it is used as a substitute.

👉The results of the meta-analysis were presented at the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) by Marion van Mackelenbergh, MD, of the University of Kiel, Germany.

👉Capecitabine alone did not alter overall disease-free survival, but when added to other systemic therapies, there was an improvement.

👉Overall survival was also improved when capecitabine was given in addition to other therapies.

👉There is no evidence supporting a predictive value of capecitabine-specific adverse events on outcome.

👉It can be concluded that the addition of capecitabine to other treatment may be recommended for patients with triple-negative.

👉The meta-analysis showed no data comparing the effects of capecitabine with carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer.

👉One trial is recruiting patients to evaluate this in the post-neoadjuvant setting.

👉The effect of capecitabine compared with other systemic therapies, including carboplatin, remains to be investigated.

👉Capecitabine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as monotherapy or in combination with docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer.

👉The meta-analysis results addressed its use in early breast cancer.

👉Several randomized trials have evaluated the effect of capecitabine in early breast cancer, mainly in high-risk patients.

👉The German Breast Group investigators sought to examine the effect of capecitabine in patients with early breast cancer on disease-free survival as the primary objective; secondary endpoints included the effect of capecitabine on overall survival and to determine whether there was an interaction between capecitabine-specific toxicity and treatment effect.

👉Study Details👈

👉The meta-analysis included individual patient data from 15,457 patients enrolled in 12 randomized controlled trials; 7,983 patients with early breast cancer were treated with capecitabine, and 7,474 patients were in the control arms.

👉Five of the trials included in the meta-analysis addressed capecitabine given instead of other therapies, and seven evaluated the use of capecitabine in addition to other therapies.

👉The analysis was performed on the overall study population and in two predefined subsets: patients who received capecitabine in addition to other therapies and those who received capecitabine instead of another systemic treatment.

👉The median age of patients at initial diagnosis was 53 years.

👉Nearly three-quarters of patients had nodal involvement; 56% presented with tumor stage II disease; about 68% had hormone receptor–positive disease; 45% had high-grade disease; 15% had HER2-positive breast cancer.

👉About 80% of the patients were treated in the adjuvant setting and almost 20%, in the neoadjuvant setting.

👉Key Findings👈

👉Among the entire data set, there was no significant effect of capecitabine alone on disease-free survival, but a significant benefit was observed in the patients who received capecitabine in addition to other systemic therapies (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.888, 95% confidence interval [CI[ = 0.817–0.965).

👉Only the CREATE-X trial had positive results for disease-free survival, and no benefit of capecitabine on disease-free survival was observed when capecitabine was given instead of another treatment.

👉A slight benefit for capecitabine was observed in overall survival for the total data set (HR = 0.892, 95% CI = 0.824–0.965; P = .005), which was more pronounced when capecitabine was added to other systemic therapies (HR = 0.837, 95% CI = 0.751–0.933; P = .001).

👉Only the CREATE-X and USON 01062 trials were positive for overall survival.

👉There was no overall survival benefit [in the meta-analysis] when capecitabine was substituted for another systemic therapy.

👉In patients with triple-negative breast cancer, capecitabine improved disease-free survival by 18% when added to standard chemotherapy and overall survival by 22% (P = .004 for both analyses).

👉Only benefit of capecitabine was observed in the triple-negative breast cancer overall cohort and when capecitabine was added [to another therapy].

👉No benefit was observed in triple-negative breast cancer when capecitabine was given instead of another systemic therapy.

👉The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities associated with capecitabine were mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, and diarrhea.

👉No significant associations were reported between capecitabine-specific toxicities and treatment benefit.

#Arrangoiz

#BreastSurgeon

#CancerSurgeon

#SurgicalOncologist

#SABCS19 #capecitabine #triplenegativebreastcancer #TNBC #breastcancer

https://ascopost.com/news/january-2020/when-added-to-other-systemic-therapies-capecitabine-improves-outcomes-in-triple-negative-breast-cancer/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s