The use of an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) with an inhibitor of the cyclin dependent kinases 4 and 6 (ribociclib):
Was compared with an aromatase inhibitor alone in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer:
In the MONALEESA-2 study
MONALEESA-2 Trial:
Results showed an improvement with the addition of ribociclib to letrozole alone in:
Progression-free survival (PFS):
From 42.2% to 63%
Overall response rate:
From 37.1% to 52.7%
This regimen was also investigated in premenopausal women with advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and improved PFS compared with placebo plus endocrine therapy
References
Hortobagi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med.2016;375(18)1738-1748.
Tripathy D, Im SA2, Colleoni M3, Franke F4, Bardia A5, Harbeck Nm et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(7):904-915.
A mandibulotomy can be performed in one of three locations:
Lateral:
Through the body or angle of the mandible
Midline
Paramedian
A lateral mandibulotomy has several disadvantages:
First, the muscular pull on the two segments of the mandible is unequal:
Putting the mandibulotomy site under significant stress and causing a delay in healing:
For this reason, intermaxillary fixation may be required
Second, the ability to gain access to the suture line to maintain cleanliness following surgery in the oral cavity is hampered as a result of intermaxillary fixationleading to poor oral hygiene and the potential risk for sepsis of the suture line
Third, a lateral mandibulotomy poses several anatomic disadvantages including:
Denervation of the teeth distal to the mandibulotomy site and the skin of the chin:
As a result of transection of the inferior alveolar nerve
A lateral mandibulotomy also causes devascularization of the distal teeth and the distal segment of the mandible:
From its endosteal blood supply
The exposure provided by a lateral mandibulotomy:
Is limited
If the patient needs postoperative radiation therapy:
Delayed healing can lead to complications at the site of the mandibulotomy
For these reasons, a lateral mandibulotomy:
Is not recommended
By placing the mandibulotomy in the anterior midline:
All the disadvantages of a lateral mandibulotolotomy:
Are avoided
However, splitting the mandible in the midline:
Requires extraction of one central incisor tooth:
To avoid exposure of the roots of both central incisor teeth:
Which are at risk of extrusion
Extraction of one central incisor tooth alters the aesthetic appearance of the lower dentition
In addition, a midline mandibulotomy requires:
Division of muscles arising from the genial tubercle, that is:
The geniohyoid and genioglossus:
Leading to a delayed recovery of the functions of mastication and swallowing
Therefore a median mandibulotomy:
Also is not preferred for these reasons
A paramedian mandibulotomy:
On the other hand, avoids all the disadvantages of a lateral mandibulotomy and the sequelae of a midline mandibulotomy
It offers significant advantages, such as:
Wide exposure
Preservation of the geniohyoid and genioglossus muscles:
Leading to preservation of the hyomandibular complex
The only muscle requiring division is the mylohyoid muscle:
Which leads to minimal swallowing difficulties
A paramedian mandibulotomy:
Does not cause denervation or devascularization of the skin of the chin or the teeth and mandible
Fixation at the mandibulotomy site is easy
The site of the mandibulotomy is able to withstand radiation therapy if the patient needs postoperative treatment
Thus at present a paramedian mandibulotomy:
Remains an optimal surgical approach for access to posteriorly located larger lesions of the oral cavity and tumors of the oropharynx and parapharyngeal space
The latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines:
Have added fluoroestradiol F18 (FES) PET scan to its list of considerations for patients with recurrent or metastatic ER breast cancer
The NCCN guideline now recommends clinicians consider the use of FES PET for ER-positive disease during work-up of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
The guideline update follows the publication of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging’s appropriate use criteria statement on ER-targeted PET imaging in March of 2023:
Which noted that FES PET is appropriate when a clinician is considering endocrine therapy and assessing ER status at initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer, when the disease progresses after endocrine therapy, when lesions are challenging or dangerous to biopsy, and / or when other tests evaluating ER status are inconclusive
The addition to FES PET in the NCCN guidelines in addition to fluorodeoxyglucose gives clinicians an opportunity to assess ER function in all tumor sites in patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer
FES was approved by the FDA for use as an adjunct to biopsy in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer in May 2020 and is currently the only imaging agent approved by the agency for that indication:
This is a helpful tool for diagnostic confirmation and may have the ability to aid in prognosis and prediction of clinical benefit from endocrine based therapies, including with CDK 4/6 inhibitors
We have many endocrine options now, and FES PET may identify patients who remain ER+ and thus potentially benefit from endocrine based therapy
With HER2 negative breast cancer and residual disease after undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy:
To standard postsurgical treatment and capecitabine or placebo
The primary end point:
Was disease-free survival (DFS)
Secondary end points included:
Overall survival (OS)
DFS was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (placebo):
74.1% vs. 67.6% of the patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer at 5 years
Among patients with triple-negative disease:
DFS was 69.8% in the capecitabine group versus 56.1% in the control group
OS rate was 78.8% versus 70.3%
There is no role for tamoxifen or anastrozole in triple negative breast cancer
Residual disease after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy:
Is associated with worse outcomes
References
1. Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, Im YH, Lee ES, Yokota I, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Eng J Med. 2017;376(22):2147-2159.
2. Symmans WF, Wei C, Gould R, Yu X, Zhang Y, Liu M, et al. Long-term prognostic risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with residual cancer burden and breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(10):1049-1060.
The omission of adjuvant regional nodal irradiation did not appear to increase the risk for recurrence or death among patients with breast cancer whose disease converted from lymph node-positive to lymph node-negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, according to research presented at the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
There is no standard of care in place for patients with breast cancer for whom neoadjuvant chemotherapy has eliminated lymph node involvement, the researchers explained
The researchers performed a phase 3 clinical trial of 1,641 patients with lymph-node positive, nonmetastatic breast cancer who were found to have no lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery
They randomly assigned patients to two different regimens:
One group was assigned to skip regional nodal irradiation after undergoing mastectomy or whole breast irradiation and breast-conserving surgery
The other group was assigned to continue with chest wall irradiation and regional nodal irradiation following mastectomy or whole-breast irradiation plus regional nodal irradiation and breast-conserving surgery
Median follow-up was 59.5 months, and patients were a median of 52 years old
Seventy-eight percent had experienced a complete breast pathological response
In the “no regional nodal irradiation group,” 91.8% of patients were invasive breast cancer-recurrence free at 5 years compared with 92.7% of those who did undergo regional nodal irradiation
In both groups, 93.4% of patients were reported to be distant-recurrence free at 5 years
Overall survival was 94% in patients who were assigned to skip regional nodal irradiation and 93.6% in those who did not skip the therapy, according to the researchers
The researchers are planning a longer-term follow-up to further examine their findings, and a 10-year analysis time point was reached this past year
There findings suggest that downstaging cancer-positive regional lymph nodes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can allow some patients to skip adjuvant regional nodal irradiation without adversely affecting oncologic outcomes
Follow-up of patients for long-term outcomes continues
Reference:
Mamounas, E. Loco-regional irradiation in patients with biopsy-proven axillary node involvement at presentation who become pathologically node-negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Primary outcomes of NRG Oncology/NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304. Abstract GS02-07. SABCS 2023
In women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2-negative early breast cancer, the 21-gene signature score:
Provides prognostic information that is independent of clinicopathological features
A high score (on a scale of 0 to 100) indicates:
A higher rate of distant recurrence and is predictive of chemotherapy benefit
The prospective Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx);
Showed that endocrine therapy alone was noninferior to adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy:
In women with HR+, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer and a 21-gene recurrence score of 11 to 25
An exploratory analysis indicated some benefit of chemotherapy:
In women 50 years of age or younger who had a recurrence score of 16 to 25
In this analysis there was a small (~1.6%) chemotherapy benefit in distant disease-free survival for patients with recurrence score results from 16 to 20, and a modest (~6.5%) chemotherapy benefit for patients with recurrence score results from 21 to 25
References
1. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. New Engl J Med. 2019;380(25):2395-2405.
2. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. New Engl J Med. 2018;379(2):111-121.
Fibroadenomas:Are benign, solid neoplasms of the breast:Consisting of fibroepithelial elements
Their size is hormonally influenced:As evidenced byfluctuation in size with the menstrual cycle and regression in postmenopausal women
Fibroadenomas are often solitary masses:But in approximately 25% of patients present with multiple lesion’s
They have a characteristic clinical presentation: Rubbery, mobile, and firm:Despite this, previous reports have indicated that diagnosis by clinical examination:Is accurate in only 50% to 75% of patient’s
One of the clinical dilemmas facing both surgeons and patients is the concern that the mass is something more ominous than a fibroadenoma:Both benign and malignant phylloides tumors may mimic fibroadenomas
Additionally, published reports have described adenocarcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ:Arising within fibroadenomas or misdiagnosed as fibroadenomas
Because of the potential for more aggressive pathology masquerading as fibroadenomas:Management has been debated and recommendations changed several times in recent decades:Until the mid-1980s:Standard practice was excision of all fibroadenomas
Subsequent studies in the 1980s and 1990s:Demonstrated the safety of observing the presumed fibroadenomas:In women under age 35:Who had a fine-needle aspirate biopsy that did not contain malignant or suspicious cells
More recently, the question has been asked whether biopsy is even necessary:Smith and Burrows concluded:That patients under the age of 25 with benign ultrasound findings:Could be safely observed without a biopsy
Criteria for excision of suspected fibroadenomas of the breast: Patients with an age greater than 35 years
Immobile or poorly circumscribed mass
Size greater than 2.5 cm
Biopsy not definitive for fibroadenoma
Fibroadenomas:Son neoplasias benignas y sólidas de la mama que consisten en elementos fibroepiteliales.
Su tamaño está influenciado hormonalmente: Como lo demuestra la fluctuación en el tamaño con el ciclo menstrual y regresión en mujeres posmenopáusicas.
Los fibroadenomas son a menudo tumores solitarios: Pero en aproximadamente el 25% de los pacientes presentan lesiones múltiples
Tienen una presentación clínica característica: Gomoso, móvil y firme: A pesar de esto, informes anteriores han indicado que el diagnóstico mediante examen clínico: Es preciso en solo 50% a 75% de los pacientes
Uno de los dilemas clínicos que enfrentan los cirujanos y los pacientes es la preocupación de que la tumoración sea algo más siniestra que un fibroadenoma: Los tumores filoides benignos y malignos pueden simular fibroadenomas:Además, los informes publicados han descrito el adenocarcinoma y el carcinoma ductal in situ: Surgen dentro de fibroadenomas o se diagnostican erróneamente como fibroadenomas.
Debido al potencial de una patología más agresiva disfrazada de fibroadenomas: El manejo ha sido debatida y las recomendaciones cambiaron varias veces en las últimas décadas:Hasta mediados de la década de 1980: La práctica estándar fue la escisión de todos los fibroadenomas.
Estudios posteriores en las décadas de 1980 y 1990: Demostró la seguridad de observar los presuntos fibroadenomas: En mujeres menores de 35 años que tuvieron una biopsia por aspiración con aguja fina que no contenía células malignas o sospechosas
Más recientemente, se ha preguntado si la biopsia es necesaria: Smith y Burrows concluyeron: Que los pacientes menores de 25 años con hallazgos benignos de ultrasonido: Podría observarse con seguridad sin una biopsia.