This nerve is a cutaneous branch of the intercostal nerves:
Most commonly the second intercostal nerve:
Which gives off a lateral cutaneous nerve:
Which continues as the intercostobrachial nerve
The intercostal nerves arise from:
The anterior rami of the thoracic spinal nerves
The intercostobrachial nerve pierces the serratus anterior:
Crosses the axilla to the medial side of the upper arm
The intercostobrachial nerve is commonly in the surgical field during axillary lymph node dissections and may be severed during surgery, or subject to traction or postsurgical inflammation:
Thus leading to intercostobrachial neuralgia
The larger intercostal nerves:
Can be preserved with meticulous dissection
Neuropathic symptoms:
May be limited to numbness or tingling:
But may also include a burning sensation
Techniques such as a regional nerve block:
Have been described to alleviate symptoms in severe cases
In a study of 200 patients who underwent axillary dissection:
76% had symptoms of intercostobrachial neuralgia postoperatively
Of these patients, 82% reported improvement or resolution of these symptoms within 1 year:
Reflecting the richness of the sensory nerve supply to the axilla and upper arm
The thoracodorsal nerve:
Is a branch of the posterior cord of the brachial plexus:
It supplies motor function to the latissimus dorsi
If injured, patients experience weakness with arm abduction, lateral flexion, and difficulty with activities such as climbing, swimming, and using the arms to pull the body up
The medial cord of the brachial plexus:
Gives rise to the medial pectoral nerve:
Which innervates both the pectoralis minor muscle and the pectoralis major muscle
The medial pectoral nerve typically pierces the pectoralis minor muscle:
But may wrap around the lateral aspect of the pectoralis minor before traveling on to innervate the distal pectoralis major muscle
The lateral cord of the brachial plexus:
Gives rise to the lateral pectoral nerve:
Which innervates the pectoralis major muscle
This nerve travels along the medial border of the pectoralis minor muscle:
Then along the undersurface of the pectoralis major muscle along with the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial artery to supply the proximal pectoralis major muscle
The medial pectoral nerve bundle:
Is often encountered during axillary dissection as it is located lateral to the lateral pectoral nerve
If either of these nerves is injured:
Pectoralis muscle atrophy can occur:
Which can present as a late complication of surgery, with weakness of shoulder adduction, interior rotation, and flexion
The long thoracic nerve:
Typically arises from anterior rami of the cervical spinal nerve roots C5 to C7
It courses along the chest wall and supplies the serratus anterior muscle
Injury to this nerve causes a winged scapula
References:
Sclafani LM, Baron RH. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: added morbidity of the arm, shoulder and chest wall after mastectomy and reconstruction. Cancer J. 2008;14(4):216-222.
Wisotzky EM, Saini V, Kao C. Ultrasound-guided intercostobrachial nerve block for intercostobrachial neuralgia in breast cancer patients: a case series. Prev Med Rep, 2016;8(3):273-277.
Roses DF, Brooks AD, Harris MN, Shapiro RL, Mitnick J. Complications of level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Sur. 1999;230(2):194-201.
Porzionato A, Macchi V, Stecco C, Loukas M, Tubbs RS, De Caro R. Surgical anatomy of the pectoral nerves and the pectoral musculature. Clin Anat. 2012;25(5):559-575.
What You Need to Know About Head and Neck Cancer Treatments That Provide Life-Saving Results
By Dr. Rodrigo Arrangoiz, MS, MD, FACS, FSSO – Surgical Oncologist, Mount Sinai Medical Center
From the way we speak and eat to how we breathe and express emotions, the head and neck region plays a vital role in daily life. Unfortunately, this complex area is also susceptible to a variety of cancers that can dramatically affect a person’s health and quality of life. That’s why understanding head and neck cancers—their risk factors, symptoms, and treatment options—is critical for early detection and successful outcomes.
As a surgical oncologist specializing in head and neck and breast cancers at Mount Sinai Medical Center, I’ve seen firsthand how early diagnosis and expert care can be lifesaving. During Head and Neck Cancer Awareness Month, I want to share what patients and families should know.
What Is Head and Neck Cancer?
Head and neck cancer is not a single disease but a group of biologically similar cancers that begin in the squamous cells lining the mucosal surfaces inside the head and neck—such as the mouth, throat, and voice box. Cancers can also arise in the salivary glands, thyroid, sinuses, or skin of the face and scalp.
According to the National Cancer Institute, over 72,000 Americans will be diagnosed with a head and neck cancer in 2025 alone. These cases often involve complex anatomy and require a multidisciplinary approach to treatment.
Risk Factors You Should Know
Several risk factors are strongly linked to head and neck cancers:
Tobacco and alcohol use: These remain the leading causes, especially when combined. Human papillomavirus (HPV): HPV is now the leading cause of oropharyngeal cancers, particularly in younger, non-smoking patients. Sun exposure: Prolonged UV exposure increases the risk of skin cancers in the facial and scalp areas. Poor oral hygiene, poor nutrition, and exposure to certain industrial chemicals also contribute to overall risk.
Know the Signs—And Speak Up
Symptoms can be subtle. If you notice persistent hoarseness, difficulty swallowing, a lump in the neck, or an unusual growth in the mouth or throat, don’t delay—get evaluated by your primary care physician. You may be referred to a head and neck surgical oncologist for further testing.
Early detection makes a difference. Many head and neck cancers are curable when caught in the early stages.
The Role of Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
As a surgical oncologist, my role involves diagnosing and surgically treating tumors in the head and neck region—both benign and malignant. Surgery can be curative, especially when paired with other therapies like radiation or chemotherapy.
Common conditions and procedures we manage include:
Thyroid and parathyroid surgery for cancer or overactivity Salivary gland tumor removal (parotid, submandibular) Lymph node dissections in the neck for cancer staging or treatment Mouth and throat tumor resections, sometimes involving the tongue or larynx Skin cancer excisions and facial reconstruction Advanced reconstructive surgery using microvascular techniques when necessary
Each patient receives a personalized plan based on the tumor type, location, stage, and overall health. At Mount Sinai’s Comprehensive Cancer Center, we combine advanced surgical techniques with cutting-edge diagnostics, targeted therapies, and compassionate, team-based care.
Expertise at Mount Sinai Medical Center
Mount Sinai’s Comprehensive Cancer Center is one of South Florida’s leading institutions for head and neck cancer care. We offer:
State-of-the-art imaging and biopsy services A multidisciplinary tumor board to tailor treatment plans Access to clinical trials and the latest medical advancements Reconstructive surgery expertise for functional and cosmetic outcomes Post-treatment rehabilitation, including speech and swallowing therapy
Our goal is to not only treat the cancer but also preserve quality of life—whether that’s helping a patient regain their voice, their smile, or their confidence.
About Dr. Rodrigo Arrangoiz
Dr. Rodrigo Arrangoiz is a board-certified surgical oncologist with specialized fellowship training in complex head and neck surgery and breast surgical oncology. He is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons (FACS) and the Society of Surgical Oncology (FSSO). He completed his advanced training at some of the most prestigious cancer centers in the U.S. and currently practices at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, where he provides cutting-edge, compassionate cancer care.
To learn more about Mount Sinai’s Comprehensive Cancer Center, visit:
The breast extends from the lateral border of the sternum to the midaxillary line:
In some individuals, into the axilla itself
The adult breast consists of:
Glandular and adipose tissue:
Together with a system of connecting ligaments
1. Nipple:
This is located at the apex of the breast and projects up to 1 cm
Optimizing its positioning is of utmost importance in breast surgery
In the average adult female the nipples lie in the midclavicular line:
19 cm to 21 cm from the sternal notch and 9 cm to 11 cm from the midline:
But their position varies widely according to shape, size and age
2. Areola:
This is a circular area of skin that surrounds the nipple
Its color darkens during pregnancy due to the deposition of melanin
The areolar skin contains Montgomery glands:
Which secrete a protective oily lubricant
3. Glandular tissue:
The glandular tissue is the functional component of the lactating breast and the site of milk production, which is passed to the nipple via a system of ducts:
Each breast, or mammary gland:
Contains 15 to 20 lobes and each lobe is comprised of 20 to 40 terminal ductal lobular units (TDLU):
The TDLU is the functional unit of the breast
The breast mound is roughly hemispherical
The bulk of the glandular tissue is found in the upper outer quadrant:
Which is the commonest site of malignancy.
4. Adipose tissue:
This forms up to 70% of the breast mass:
It is the main determinant of breast size
5. Ligaments:
The structure and shape of the breast is maintained by fascial and ligamentous supports:
As first described by Sir Astley Cooper in 1840
Superficial fascial system:
The breast is enveloped by the superficial and deep laminae of the superficial fascia:
The superficial lamina is separated from the dermis by a thin layer of fatty tissue:
But is often difficult to identify as a separate entity
Suspensory ligaments of Cooper:
These fibrous strands extend through the breast parenchyma between the layers of the superficial and deep (pre-pectoral) fascia:
They help to maintain a non-ptotic breast shape
6. Axillary tail (of Spence):
There is a variable extension along the inferior edge of pectoralis major towards the axilla
This usually lies within the subcutaneous fat but may penetrate the axillary fascia to lie adjacent to the lymph nodes
Occasionally it is a separate entity with ducts that do not drain to the nipple.
7. Retromammary space:
In reality this is not a space but a plane of loose connective tissue lying between the deep lamina of the superficial fascia and the deep pre-pectoral fascia
Chassaignac bursa (also known as the retromammary bursa, submammary serous bursa or occasionally Chassaignac bag):
Is the space behind the breast, lying between the pectoralis fascia posteriorly and deep layer of superficial fascia anteriorly
This is the plane of dissection in which a subglandular pocket can be created for insertion of a prosthesis for breast augmentation
8. Muscle:
The medial two-thirds of the base of the breast lie over the pectoralis major muscle
The lateral one-third lies over serratus anterior and a small portion of the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles
The muscles are separated from the breast by the deep fascia
9. Rib cage:
Deformities of the ribs, including those that are secondary to a spinal deformity can lead to an apparent asymmetry of breast position and/or shape
Vascular Supply of the breast:
The breast has a rich blood supply:
Which permits safe division and excision of breast tissue:
The viability of the nipple areolar complex is dependent on vessels that pass through the gland:
Which must therefore be preserved
There are three main arterial systems:
Internal Thoracic (Mammary) Artery:
Is responsible for roughly 60% of the vascular supply to the breast
Arising directly from the subclavian artery, the internal thoracic artery passes posterior to the subclavian vein and runs along the edge of the sternum, deep to the costal cartilages
Perforating branches of the internal thoracic artery pass through the 2nd to 6th intercostal spaces to supply the medial half of the breast:
The 2nd and 3rd perforators are the predominant vessels and these are preferred for anastomosis when reconstructing the breast with a free tissue transfer
Lateral Thoracic Artery:
A branch of the second portion of the axillary artery:
Supplies the upper outer quadrant of the breast
The lateral thoracic artery runs along the lower border of the pectoralis minor muscle and curls around the lateral border of pectoralis major to enter the breast
Other branches of the lateral thoracic artery perforate pectoralis major to supply the overlying breast tissue
Posterior Intercostal Arteries:
The lateral branch of the posterior intercostal arteries divides into posterior and anterior branches
The anterior branches from the 3rd to 6th intercostal spaces supply the lateral portion of the breast and the overlying skin through their mammary branches
Other Supply:
The axillary artery also provides other branches to the breast, including the:
Superior thoracic artery:
A branch from the first part of the axillary artery)
The pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial artery and the subscapular artery
The venous drainage of the breast is via two venous systems:
Superficial system:
Which lies within the subdermal venous plexus:
The pattern of drainage is highly variable
Deep system:
The deep venous system parallels the arterial supply:
The medial half of the breast drains via veins that accompany the perforating branches of the internal mammary artery through the intercostal spaces, back to the internal mammary vein
The lateral thoracic veins drain into the axillary vein
The posterior intercostal veins drain into the azygous vein on the right and the hemiazygous vein on the left
Innervation of the breast:
The nerve supply to the breast consists of sensory fibres from the skin and sympathetic efferent fibres to the blood vessels, glandular tissue and smooth muscle cells in the skin and nipple
The sensory nerve supply is derived from cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves:
Medially:
Anterior branches of the 1st to 6th intercostal nerves
Laterally:
Lateral branches of the 2nd to 6th intercostal nerves
Nipple areola complex:
Supplied by the anterior branch of the 4th intercostal nerve
There is an extensive nerve plexus within the nipple
The skin of the nipple areola complex contains free nerve endings, Meissner’s corpuscles and Merkel disc endings
Is defined as persistent or newly identified locoregional or distant metastases on imaging:
Usually in conjunction with elevated thyroglobulin (Tg) and / or anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) levels
It is one of four response-to-therapy categories in the ATA dynamic risk stratification system:
Alongside excellent, indeterminate, and biochemical incomplete responses
Criteria by Treatment Context:
The definition of SIR is consistent regardless of surgical extent:
Structural evidence of disease confirmed by suspicious imaging or biopsy-proven local or distant metastatic disease
The TSH goal for patients with SIR:
Is maintained below the normal reference range
Prevalence and Outcomes:
SIR occurs in approximately 2.8% to 10% of DTC patients after initial therapy
In a cohort of 501 patients treated with total thyroidectomy and RAI:
2.8% had SIR at initial assessment:
By last follow-up, 10.2% had structurally incomplete responses
Key outcome data include:
Patients with an initial SIR:
Had an 83.9% rate of continued structural disease over long-term follow-up (mean 10.3 years)
All patients categorized as SIR after total thyroidectomy without RAI:
Experienced continued presence of disease
SIR requires multidisciplinary management tailored to disease status (regional vs. distant metastases, iodine-avid vs. non-iodine-avid disease)
Management:
Management of SIR depends on:
Disease location, RAI avidity, resectability, and rate of progression
Locoregional disease:
Surgery is preferred for resectable locoregional recurrence:
With formal compartmental dissection for previously undissected basins
RAI therapy:
If radioiodine imaging is positive
Active surveillance:
Is appropriate for non-progressive disease that is stable and distant from critical structures:
Small-volume lymph node recurrences often show little progression over years
Local therapies (ethanol ablation, RFA, cryoablation):
May be considered for limited-burden nodal disease
RAI-refractory or progressive disease:
Somatic molecular testing for actionable mutations (BRAF, RET, NTRK, ALK fusions; dMMR/MSI/TMB) is recommended for advanced, progressive, or threatening disease
Systemic therapy for progressive and/or symptomatic disease:
Lenvatinib (preferred; PFS 18.3 vs. 3.6 months, ORR 65%)
Sorafenib (PFS 10.8 vs. 5.8 months)
Cabozantinib after prior VEGFR TKI (PFS 11.0 vs. 1.9 months)
Targeted therapies:
Dabrafenib / trametinib (BRAF V600E)
Selpercatinib / pralsetinib (RET fusion)
Larotrectinib / entrectinib (NTRK fusion)
Pembrolizumab (MSI-H/dMMR or TMB-H)
Disease monitoring is often appropriate for asymptomatic patients with indolent, non-progressive disease and no brain metastases:
TKI therapy may not be appropriate for stable or slowly progressive disease
TSH suppression should be maintained with TSH
References:
2025 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Ringel MD, Sosa JA, Baloch Z, et al. Thyroid : Official Journal of the American Thyroid Association. 2025;35(8):841-985. doi:10.1177/10507256251363120.
SNMMI Procedure Standard/Eanm Practice Guideline for Nuclear Medicine Evaluation and Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Abbreviated Version. Avram AM, Giovanella L, Greenspan B, et al. Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official Publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2022;63(6):15N-35N.
Thyroid Carcinoma. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Updated 2025-03-27. Thyroid Cancer. Chen DW, Lang BHH, McLeod DSA, Newbold K, Haymart MR. Lancet (London, England). 2023;401(10387):1531-1544. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00020-X.
Type A glands are in the accepted, expected location of a normal parathyroid gland
Type B:
Behind the thyroid parenchyma
Type B glands are exophytic to the thyroid parenchyma and lie in the tracheoesophageal groove:
This category includes adenomas in:
Retroesophageal, retropharyngeal, high lateral pharyngeal, and carotid sheath locations
A ‘‘B+’’ subcategory can be used to document the location of adenomas above the level of the hyoid bone:
The ‘‘+’’ is meant to reflect cranial elevation
Type C:
Caudal to the thyroid parenchyma:
In the tracheoesophageal groove
A type C gland is more inferior than a type B gland on lateral images:
Located inferior to the inferior pole of the thyroid:
Closer to the clavicle
Type D:
Directly over the recurrent laryngeal nerve:
At the level of the inferior thyroid vessels
The dissection may be difficult:
Because a type D gland is dangerously close to the recurrent laryngeal nerve
Type E:
Located in the external aspect of the inferior pole of the thyroid
A type E gland is in a location that is:
More superficial in an anterior–posterior plane than the recurrent laryngeal nerve:
It is the easiest to resect
Type F:
‘‘Fallen’’ into the thyrothymic ligament:
Below the inferior pole of the thyroid in a pretracheal plane
A type F gland is frequently referred to as an ectopic gland:
Its resection usually involves:
Transcervical delivery of the thyrothymic ligament or superior portion of the thymus
Type G:
A gauge, true intrathyroidal gland location
Schematic representation of the nomenclature system for localization of parathyroid adenomas. Anterior view (a); right lateral view (b) of the superior thyroid pole is oriented to the left. The dotted circle depicts the region where the recurrent laryngeal nerve is most at risk
This nomenclature system has been designed that takes into account the pathologic position of the parathyroid glands (Figure):
Superior and inferior glands:
Are defined by the location of the gland’s pedicle and its relationship to the RLN:
Superior parathyroid glands:
Anatomically have a vascular pedicle superior and lateral to the RLN (type A through D glands)
Inferior parathyroid glands:
Anatomically have a vascular pedicle inferior and medial to the RLN (type D through F glands)
Type G glands:
Represent intrathyroidal parathyroid lesions
This information not only helps radiologists communicate potential parathyroid lesions of interest to surgeons:
But also helps surgeons direct their dissection in relation to the RLN
Develop as epithelial thickenings of the dorsal endoderm of the:
Third and fourth branchial pouches
The superior parathyroid glands:
Are derived from the fourth branchial pouch:
Which also gives rise to the ultimobranchial bodies:
The ventral aspect of these pouches is believed to fuse with the rudimentary fifth branchial pouches:
To from the ultimobranchial bodies
The superior parathyroid glands follow the migration of the ultimobranchial bodies:
Which descend a relative limited path toward the lateral thyroid region:
Ultimately giving rise to the parafollicular cells of the thyroid
The superior parathyroid glands separate from the ultimobranchial bodies:
As the median and lateral thyroid anlages fuse and incorporate the ultimobranchial bodies:
This separation event determines the final anatomic position of the superior parathyroid glands relative to the thyroid (Type A gland)
The inferior parathyroid glands:
Are derived from the third branchial pouch (dorsal aspect):
Along with the thymus (derived from the ventral aspect of the third branchial pouch)
The parathyroid glands:
Remain intimately connected with their respective branchial pouch derivatives
The normal anatomic location of the superior parathyroid glands:
Is more constant than the inferior parathyroid glands:
With 80% of the superior glands being found near the posterior aspect of the thyroid gland:
At the junction of the upper and middle portion of the thyroid lobes:
At the level of the cricoid cartilage:
Each gland with its own capsule of connective tissue:
Type A gland
Roughly one percent (1%) of the superior parathyroid glands:
May be found in the paraesophageal or retroesophageal space, retrolaryngeal space, high lateral pharyngeal, and carotid shealth locations:
Type B glands:
Behind the thyroid parenchyma:
Type B glands are exophytic to the thyroid parenchyma:
Lie in the tracheoesophageal groove
Type C glands:
Caudal to the thyroid parenchyma:
In the tracheoesophageal groove
A type C gland is more inferior than a type B gland on lateral images and located inferior to the inferior pole of the thyroid (closer to the clavicle)
Enlarged superior parathyroid glands:
May descend in the tracheoesophageal groove and come to lie below the inferior parathyroid glands (Type C gland)
Truly ectopic superior parathyroid glands:
Are extremely rare:
But may be localized to the middle or posterior mediastinum or in the aortopulmonary window
During intrauterine development:
The thymus and the inferior parathyroid glands:
Migrate caudally in the neck
The most common location for the inferior parathyroid glands:
Is within 1 cm from a point centered where the inferior thyroid artery and the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) cross
In roughly 50% of the cases:
The inferior parathyroid gland is located at the level of the inferior thyroid lobe:
Anterior of the posterolateral surface:
Type E:
Located in the external aspect of the inferior pole of the thyroid
A type E gland is in a location that is more superficial in an anterior-posterior plane than the recurrent laryngeal nerve
It is the easiest to resect
Approximately 15% to 50% of the inferior glands:
Are found in the thyrothymic ligament or the thymus
The inferior parathyroid gland is typically situated within a pocket of thymic derived fatty tissue:
But may be closely adherent to the thyroid capsule
The position of the inferior parathyroid glands:
However, tends to be more variable due to their longer migratory route:
Undescended inferior glands may be found near the:
Skull base, angle of the mandible, or above the superior parathyroid glands:
Along with an undescended thymus
The frequency of intrathyroidal glands:
Is approximately 2%
Superior parathyroid glands (4th branchial pouch):
Short migration
More constant location
Posterior to RLN, near cricothyroid joint
Inferior glands (3rd branchial pouch):
Long migration with thymus
Highly variable
Can be anywhere from angle of mandible → mediastinum
The classification is built on this predictable vs variable descent pattern
The Perrier Classification System
The authors propose categorizing adenomas based on their relationship to key anatomic landmarks, especially:
Thyroid gland
Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN)
Thymus
Carotid sheath
📍 Four Main Categories
Type A — Orthotopic (Normal Position)
Located in expected anatomical position
Adjacent to thyroid gland
Most common
👉 Clinical relevance:
Ideal for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP)
High concordance with sestamibi + ultrasound
Type B — Ectopic but Cervical
Includes:
Retroesophageal
Carotid sheath
Intrathyroidal
High cervical (undescended)
👉 Key point: Still in the neck but outside usual location
👉 Surgical implication:
May require focused but modified approach
Intrathyroidal → partial thyroid resection
Type C — Thymic / Thyrothymic
Along thymic descent pathway
Thyrothymic ligament
Within cervical thymus or upper mediastinum
👉 Most common ectopic site for inferior glands
👉 Surgical implication:
Cervical thymectomy often required
Important in failed initial exploration
Type D — Mediastinal
Below thoracic inlet
Aortopulmonary window, pericardium, deep thymus
👉 Rare but critical
👉 Surgical implication:
May require:
VATS
Sternotomy
Interventional radiology localization
📊 Key Findings from Perrier et al.
Majority of adenomas are Type A (orthotopic)
Ectopic locations (Types B to D) account for:
~15% to 20% of cases
Inferior glands → disproportionately represented in ectopic group
👉 The classification correlates strongly with:
Embryology
Preoperative imaging success
Surgical difficulty
🎯 Clinical Impact
1. Improves Communication
Standard language across:
Surgeons
Radiologists
Endocrinologists
2. Enhances Preoperative Planning
Predicts:
Likelihood of MIP vs BNE
Need for extended exploration
3. Reduces Failed Explorations
Particularly valuable in:
Reoperative cases
Discordant imaging
4. Facilitates Research Standardization
Enables:
Comparable outcome reporting
Better stratification in studies
🧠 Surgical Algorithm Integration
Imaging Result
Likely Type
Strategy
Concordant US + Sestamibi
Type A
Focused MIP
Discordant imaging
Type B / C
Extended cervical exploration
Negative imaging
Type C / D
Consider 4D-CT, PET, BNE
Prior failed surgery
Any (often B to D)
Systematic re-exploration
⚠️ Limitations of the Study
Retrospective classification
Single-institution experience (MD Anderson)
No direct comparison with alternative systems
Does not incorporate modern imaging (e.g., 4D-CT, PET)
📚 Key References
Perrier ND et al. World J Surg. 2009;33:412–416
Akerström G et al. Anatomy and embryology of parathyroid glands. World J Surg. 1984
Wang C. Parathyroid gland location study (645 cases). Ann Surg. 1976
You now need to identify patients who may benefit before finalizing adjuvant plan:
Candidates to flag early:
Stage II (even N0) with:
High grade
High Ki-67
Genomic high risk
Any Stage III HR+ disease
Impacts surgical-pathologic reporting priorities:
Surgeons should ensure:
Accurate nodal staging
Grade
Ki-67
Genomic assay (if used) integrated early
These directly influence eligibility for CDK4/6 therapy
Reinforces importance of recurrence biology:
Luminal cancers:
Long natural history
Late relapse risk
Ribociclib addresses micrometastatic dormancy → shifts mindset from: “Local control + endocrine therapy” → to “Extended systemic control strategy”
Treatment duration considerations:
Ribociclib:
3 years
Endocrine therapy:
≥ 5 years
Implication:
Long-term adherence planning begins at surgical consultation
Safety Profile (surgeon-relevant highlights):
Common:
Neutropenia (non-febrile)
LFT elevation
QT prolongation
No new long-term safety signals at 5 years
Clinical takeaway:
Manageable → supports use in early-stage curative setting
Key Takeaways for Surgical Practice:
Ribociclib is now a standard adjuvant option in HR+/HER2− EBC:
Especially stage II to III and biologically high-risk disease
5-year data confirms durability:
Benefit persists beyond treatment window:
Increasing absolute benefit over time
Expands eligible population:
Includes node-negative high-risk patients
Multidisciplinary coordination is critical:
Surgeons play a role in:
Early identification
Pathologic risk stratification
Timely referral to medical oncology
Bottom line (surgeon-focused):
Ribociclib from NATALEE represents a shift toward proactive systemic prevention of recurrence in luminal breast cancer, with durable 5-year benefit and broader eligibility than prior CDK4/6 strategies—making early risk identification at the surgical stage increasingly important
The Phase III LEAP-10 trial represents a major collaborative effort between Merck & Co. and Eisai, addressing a persistent unmet need in recurrent /metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).
In patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 disease, the combination of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab demonstrated:
Improved objective response rate (ORR)
Prolonged progression-free survival (PFS)
However, these gains did not translate into an overall survival (OS) benefit compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy, which remains the backbone of first-line treatment.
Clinical Context: Why OS Remains Elusive
Despite encouraging activity, the absence of OS improvement reinforces the durability of the current standard established by KEYNOTE-048 trial, where:
Pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy continues as standard of care
Survival benefit is tightly linked to PD-L1 expression and patient selection
The LEAP-10 findings highlight a recurring challenge in HNSCC:
Early efficacy signals (ORR, PFS) do not reliably predict survival benefit, particularly in an immunotherapy-sensitive disease where post-progression treatments and tumor biology heavily influence OS.
Biologic Interpretation
The addition of lenvatinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR, FGFR, and others, likely:
Enhances tumor microenvironment modulation
Improves initial tumor shrinkage and disease control
However, potential limitations include:
Lack of deep, durable immune reprogramming
Emergence of resistance mechanisms
Possible toxicity-related treatment discontinuation
These factors may blunt long-term survival impact despite improved early endpoints.
Where the Field Is Heading: EGFR and Beyond
Attention is now shifting toward next-generation EGFR-targeted strategies, with the hypothesis that:
More precise targeting of EGFR-driven signaling
Coupled with immune engagement mechanisms
may yield more durable survival benefits.
Key players advancing this space include:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Genmab
Bicara Therapeutics
Johnson & Johnson
Merus N.V.
Harvard Medical School
Emerging modalities include:
Bispecific antibodies (EGFR × immune targets)
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)
Combination immunotherapy strategies
These approaches aim to:
Overcome primary and acquired resistance
Deliver more sustained immune activation
Ultimately shift the OS curve, not just early endpoints
Key Takeaway for Clinical Practice
While lenvatinib + pembrolizumab shows meaningful biologic and clinical activity, it does not currently challenge pembrolizumab-based regimens as standard of care in PD-L1–positive R/M HNSCC.
The central question remains:
What therapeutic strategy will meaningfully and reproducibly improve overall survival in first-line HNSCC?
The next wave of EGFR-targeted and immune-engaging therapies may be the most promising path forward.
The maxillary artery supplies deep structures of the face.
It branches from the external carotid artery just deep to the neck of the mandible.
Structure:
The maxillary artery, the larger of the two terminal branches of the external carotid artery:
Arises behind the neck of the mandible, and is at first imbedded in the substance of the parotid gland.
It passes forward between the ramus of the mandible and the sphenomandibular ligament, and then runs, either superficial or deep to the lateral pterygoid muscle, to the pterygopalatine fossa.
It supplies the deep structures of the face.
May be divided into:
Mandibular portion (first part / bony part)
Pterygoid portion (second part / muscular part)
Pterygopalatine portions (third part).
Mandibular portion (first part / bony part):
The first or mandibular portion (or bony portion) passes horizontally forward, between the neck of the mandible and the sphenomandibular ligament:
Where it lies parallel to and a little below the auriculotemporal nerve.
It crosses the inferior alveolar nerve, and runs along the lower border of the lateral pterygoid muscle.
Branches include:
Deep auricular artery
Anterior tympanic artery
Middle meningeal artery
Inferior alveolar artery:
Which gives off its mylohyoid branch just prior to entering the mandibular foramen
Accessory meningeal artery
Pterygoid portion (second part / muscular part):
The second or pterygoid portion (or muscular portion) runs obliquely forward and upward under cover of the ramus of the mandible and insertion of the temporalis muscle:
On the superficial (very infrequently on the deep) surface of the lateral pterygoid muscle.
It then passes between the two heads of origin of this muscle and enters the fossa.
Branches include:
Masseteric artery
Pterygoid branches
Deep temporal arteries:
Anterior and posterior
Buccal (buccinator) artery
Pterygopalatine portions (third part):
The third or pterygopalatine portion lies in the pterygopalatine fossa in relation with the pterygopalatine ganglion.
This is considered the terminal branch of the maxillary artery.
Branches include:
Sphenopalatine artery:
Nasopalatine artery is the terminal branch of the maxillary artery
Descending palatine artery:
Greater palatine artery
Lesser palatine artery
Infraorbital artery
Posterior superior alveolar artery
Artery of pterygoid canal
Pharyngeal artery
Middle superior alveolar artery (could be a branch of the infraorbital artery)
Anterior superior alveolar arteries (could be a branch of the infraorbital artery)
Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS a head and neck surgeon at the Braman Comprehensive Cancer Center at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami, Florida.
He is first author on some publications on oral cavity cancer:
Oral Tongue Cancer: Literature Review and Current Management