Author: Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO

My name is Rodrigo Arrangoiz I am a breast surgeon/ thyroid surgeon / parathyroid surgeon / head and neck surgeon / surgical oncologist that works at Center for Advanced Surgical Oncology in Miami, Florida. I was trained as a surgeon at Michigan State University from (2005 to 2010) where I was a chief resident in 2010. My surgical oncology and head and neck training was performed at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia from 2010 to 2012. At the same time I underwent a masters in science (Clinical research for health professionals) at the University of Drexel. Through the International Federation of Head and Neck Societies / Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center I performed a two year head and neck surgery and oncology / endocrine fellowship that ended in 2016. Mi nombre es Rodrigo Arrangoiz, soy cirujano oncólogo / cirujano de tumores de cabeza y cuello / cirujano endocrino que trabaja Center for Advanced Surgical Oncology en Miami, Florida. Fui entrenado como cirujano en Michigan State University (2005 a 2010 ) donde fui jefe de residentes en 2010. Mi formación en oncología quirúrgica y e n tumores de cabeza y cuello se realizó en el Fox Chase Cancer Center en Filadelfia de 2010 a 2012. Al mismo tiempo, me sometí a una maestría en ciencias (investigación clínica para profesionales de la salud) en la Universidad de Drexel. A través de la Federación Internacional de Sociedades de Cabeza y Cuello / Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center realicé una sub especialidad en cirugía de cabeza y cuello / cirugia endocrina de dos años que terminó en 2016.

Subareolar Abscesses

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Subareolar abscesses:
    • Are a common type of nonlactational abscess
  • The pathophysiology:
    • Is believed to be keratin plugging of the lactiferous ducts:
      • Resulting in squamous metaplasia
    • The periductal inflammation that results can progress to abscess formation
  • A nipple cleft is an anatomic variant that seems to be associated with the condition:
    • Also known as Zuska’s disease
  • Because of their chronic nature including the formation of fistulas:
    • Their management involves different considerations than the management of lactational abscesses
  • Aspiration:
    • Is an appropriate practice for initial management of small non-loculated lactational and nonlactational abscesses
  • When aspiration is possible:
    • More invasive and painful procedures such as incision and drainage with postoperative daily wound packing are less appropriate as an initial step:
      • However, an abscess managed with aspiration may require serial procedures
  • Data from several small studies have demonstrated that:
    • Between 37% and 60% of abscesses will require more than one aspiration procedure
  • Aspiration is less likely to be successful for:
    • Larger abscesses
    • Multiloculated abscesses
    • Abscesses with a delay in presentation greater than 6 days
  • Antibiotics:
    • Should always be prescribed, and the likelihood of MRSA should be taken into account when choosing an initial antibiotic until culture results are available
    • Recurrent subareolar abscesses:
      • May also require anaerobic antibiotic coverage
        • For example, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prescribed with metronidazole may be a good initial choice
    • Only a minority of abscesses are treated successfully with antibiotics alone without a drainage procedures
  • Surgical excision of a chronic subareolar abscess cavity:
    • May be indicated to prevent repeated episodes and there has been debate over the most appropriate specific technique
    • Removal of the terminal ducts appears to be an important step in decreasing recurrences
    • Therefore, procedures that remove only the abscess cavity but do not remove these ducts and the fistula tract will be less successful
    • Radial elliptical incision of the involved ductal tissue and fistula tract, including excision of the central nipple, so as to include the nipple cleft in the excision, has been shown to have a high rate of success
    • Removal of the terminal ducts through a periareolar incision, also called Hadfield’s procedure, has had a higher recurrence rate in small case studies
    • Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis causing tissue ablation within the fistula is an experimental procedure
  • Smoking is a risk factor for development of subareolar abscesses, and smoking cessation should be encouraged:
    • However, smoking is not a contraindication to surgery and should not be a barrier to proceeding
  • References
    • Snider HC. Management of mastitis, abscess, and fistula. Surg Clin North Am. 2022;102(6):1103-1116. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2022.06.007
    • Lam E, Chan T, Wiseman SM. Breast abscess: evidence based management recommendations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014;12(7):753-762. doi:10.1586/14787210.2014.913982
    • Barron AU, Luk S, Phelan HA, Williams BH. Do acute-care surgeons follow best practices for breast abscess management? A single-institution analysis of 325 consecutive cases. Journal of Surgical Research. 2017;216:169-171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.013
    • Naeem M, Rahimnajjad MK, Rahimnajjad NA, Ahmed QJ, Fazel PA, Owais M. Comparison of incision and drainage against needle aspiration for the treatment of breast abscess. Am Surg. 2012;78(11):1224-7. 
    • David M, Handa P, Castaldi M. Predictors of outcomes in managing breast abscesses-a large retrospective single-center analysis. Breast J. 2018;24(5):755-763. doi:10.1111/tbj.13053

Genetic Mutation in Male Breast Cancer

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Approximately 10% of male breast cancers:
    • Are associated with genetic mutations
  • BRCA2 is the most common among the mutations:
    • With a lifetime risk of 5% to 10% among BRCA2 carriers
  • Klinefelter’s:
    • Is also associated with an increased risk of male breast cancer:
      • With an incidence between 3% and 7%
  • All male breast cancer patients:
    • Should be referred for genetic counseling and testing.
  • References
    • Korde LA, Zujewski JA, Kamin L, et al. Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2114-2122.
    • Giordano SH. Breast cancer in men. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2311-2320.

Male Breast Cancer

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Male breast cancer:
    • Accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers
  • There have been no randomized control trials:
    • For surgical management of breast cancer in men
  • Although breast conservation is increasing:
    • The current surgical management remains:
      • Simple mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy:
      • Sentinel lymph node biopsy has been demonstrated to be accurate in men
  • There are no data to support staging studies:
    • Such as positron emission tomography (PET) or computed tomography (CT):
      • In early-stage breast cancer in either men or women
  • The role of the 21-gene signature assay:
    • Is an emerging field in male breast cancer
    • There is no role for this assay without nodal evaluation
  • References
    • Fentiman IS. Surgical options for male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;172(3):539-544.
    • Gentilini O, Chagas E, Zurrida S, Intra M, De Cicco C, Gatti G, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male patients with early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2007;12(5):512-515.
    • Massarweh SA, Sledge GW, Miller DP, McCullough D, Petkov VI, Shak S. Molecular characterization and mortality from breast cancer in men. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:1396-1404.
    • Giordano SH. Breast cancer in men. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2311–2320.

Factors that Could Lead to Omission of Post Mastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT)

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Although there are proven benefits for the application of radiation therapy in patients with node positive disease following their mastectomy:
    • There are subsets of individuals where the risks of radiation (toxicities) must be weighed by the potential benefits
  • As part of a multidisciplinary conversation, there are a number of factors that should be considered prior to the utilization of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT):
    • Factors that could lead to omission of PMRT include:
      • Patient factors:
        • Increased patient age:
          • > 40-45
        • Limited life expectancy:
          • Age or comorbidities
        • Coexisting conditions that could increase radiation related complications
      • Pathologic factors: 
        • Lower tumor burden:
          • T1 tumor size
      • Absence of lymphovascular invasion
      • Presence of only a single positive node and / or small size of nodal metastases
      • Substantial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
      • Biologic characteristics: 
        • Low tumor grade
        • Strong hormonal sensitivity
  • References
    • Recht A, Comen EA, Fine RE, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy: an American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology focused guideline update. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(1):38-51.
    • McBride A, Allen P, Woodward W, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk for patients with T1,2 breast cancer with 1-3 positive lymph nodes treated with mastectomy and systemic treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89(2):392-398.
    • Lai SF, Chen YH, Kuo WH, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk for postmastectomy breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive lymph nodes receiving modern systemic treatment without radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(12):3860-3869.

Recurrence Rate of Omission of Radiation Therapy in Women with Breast Cancer Older Than 70 Years

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Previous studies evaluating the omission of radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery:
    • Found rates of local recurrence to be significantly higher
  • The CALGB 9343 study:
    • Evaluated women 70 years or older with T1N0 estrogen positive cancers undergoing breast-conserving surgery with tamoxifen and randomized women to radiation or no radiation:
      • At 10 years, the omission of radiation therapy increased the rate of local recurrence:
        • 10% vs. 2% with no difference in overall survival noted
  • References
    • Fyles AW, McCready DR, Manchul LA, et al. Tamoxifen with or without breast irradiation in women 50 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med.2004;351(10):963-970.
    • Fisher B, Bryant J, Dignam JJ, et al. Tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or both for prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy in women with invasive breast cancers of one centimeter or less. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(2):4141-4149.
    • Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2382-2387.

Ipsilateral Neck Radiation in Lateralized Oropharynx Cancer

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO

  • O’Sullivan et al:
    • Reported the results of a large retrospective review which identified oropharyngeal tumors that could be spared by contralateral ENI
  • Two hundred twenty-eight (280) patients with tonsillar carcinomas were treated with ipsilateral radiotherapy at Princess Margaret Hospital
  • Eligible patients typically had T1 or T2 tumors (191 T1 to T2, 30 T3, 7 T4) with N0 (133 N0, 35 N1, 27 N2 to N3) disease
  • Radiation was typically delivered with wedged pair Cobalt beams and ipsilateral low anterior neck field delivering 50 Gy in 4 weeks to the primary volume
  • At a median follow-up of 5.7 years:
    • The 3-year local control rate was 77%
    • Regional control rate was 80%
    • Cause-specific survival was 76%
    • Contralateral neck failure occurred in 3% (8/228)
    • All patients with T1 lesions or N0 neck status:
      • Had 100% contralateral neck control
    • Patients with a 10% or greater risk of contralateral neck failure included those with:
      • T3 lesions, lesions involving the medial one-third of the hemi-soft palate, tumors invading the middle third of the ipsilateral base of tongue, and patients with N1 disease
      • In the presence of ipsilateral node metastases:
        • The risk for contralateral neck failure was 9.5%, 14%, and 21% (all crude rates) for involvement of the soft palate, the base of tongue, and both structures, respectively
    • However, the authors appropriately note the limitations of these observations as they included patients with uncontrolled primaries and involved a total of only eight patients with contralateral neck failures
    • Despite this, the report provides confidence in the selection of patients with T1 N0 tonsil carcinomas (as well as selected patients with more advanced disease) for only ipsilateral ENI
    • Similar observations were also reported by Jackson et al. further supporting these observations

Recommendations Regarding Elective Treatment of Common Head and Neck Cancer Sites

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Given the significant risk for occult nodal involvement in certain sites of the head and neck region:
    • The standard of care has evolved to electively treat such patients:
      • Despite the lack of confirmatory randomized trials
  • Nodal coverage of levels I to III for oral cavity tumors and levels II to IV for oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal tumors:
    • Are mandatory as elective treatment
Guidelines for Neck Treatment in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Echelons of Lymph Nodes to Be Treated
  • Elective nodal irradiation including the retropharyngeal lymph nodes is added for primary tumors involving the:
    • Nasopharynx, tonsil, pharyngeal wall, and the soft palate
  • Bilateral ENI should be considered for:
    • Tumors arising from or extending to midline structures such as the soft palate, the base of tongue, and the pharyngeal wall
  • Tumor sites such as the hypopharynx and the supraglottic larynx:
    • Require bilateral ENI regardless of the specific tumor stage given high risk for contralateral nodal involvement
  • In contrast, tumor involvement of ipsilateral structures such as the parotid, the buccal mucosa, and selected tonsil cancers warrants consideration of ipsilateral ENI
  • Elective nodal irradiation including level IV lymph nodes:
    • Should be considered in those with tumors involving the tip of the oral tongue:
      • Due direct drainage to this area that bypass the orderly contiguous progression in the anterior jugular nodes
  • Involvement of the ipsilateral level V lymph nodes in node-negative oral cavity tumors is rare:
    • Occurring in less than 1% of the cases , and does not warrant ENI:
      • However, with increasing involvement of levels I to III or the involvement of level IV, the risk for level V involvement increases warranting ENI
  • In contrast, involvement of only the true vocal cords does not warrant ENI due to the paucity of lymphatic drainage

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI)

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI):
    • Is radiation delivered locally to the resected part of the breast in the setting of lumpectomy
  • The benefits of APBI include:
    • Reduced treatment time and the potential to spare radiation to healthy tissue
  • Evidence to date suggests that survival and local recurrence with APBI is as effective as whole-breast irradiation:
    • However, careful patient selection is key
  • Patients suitable for APBI include:
    • Those ≥ 50 years old
    • Negative margins (by at least 2mm)
    • Tis or T1 tumors
    • Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS):
      • Screen detected
      • Low to intermediate nuclear grade
      • ≤ 2.5cm
      • Margins of resection ≥ 3mm
  • APBI is considered cautionary in:
    • Patients 40 to 49 years old if all other criteria for suitability are met
    • Margins < 2mm
    • DCIS ≤ 3 cm and patients ≥ 50 years if patient has no unsuitable factors and at least 1 of these factors:
      • Size 2.1 to 3.0cm, T2 tumors, margins <2 mm, limited / focal lymph-vascular space invasion, ER– tumors, clinically unifocal tumors between 2.1-3.0 cm, invasive lobular histology, pure DCIS ≤3cm if criteria for suitability not fully met and EIC ≤3cm.
  • Patients are deemed unsuitable:
    • If they are below age 40
    • Between the ages of 40 to 49 years and do not meet the criteria for cautionary
    • Positive margins
    • > 3cm of DCIS
  • Current ASTRO guidelines do not recommend low energy IORT off prospective study, and electron IORT only for those patients with suitable risk factors
  • References
    • Correa C, Harris EE, Leonardi MC, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: executive summary for the update of an ASTRO evidence-based consensus statement. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017;7(2):73-79.
    • Smith BD, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(4):987-1001.

Elective Surgical versus Radiation Therapy Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • The efficacy of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus elective neck dissection:
    • Showed no obvious differences:
      • As reported by Barkley in a major retrospective experience of neck management in 596 patients with oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx carcinoma treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center:
        • Two hundred thirteen were oropharynx, 202 larynx, and 181 hypopharynx
        • Of these, 226 were N0 whereas 370 were node positive
        • Patients underwent radiation therapy (n = 292), surgical management (n = 199), or combined modality therapy (n = 105) of the neck
        • All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years and a median follow-up of 4 years
        • Among the electively treated patients:
        • Regional control was greater than 90% regardless of the treatment approach as long as comprehensive neck treatment was implemented
        • However, partial treatment of the neck resulted in 15%, 35%, and 20% regional failure after radiation, surgery, or combined therapy, respectively

Proton Therapy of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO
  • Proton therapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation:
    • Remains investigational in the treatment of breast cancer
  • An initial phase 1 / 2 trial evaluating protons for partial breast irradiation:
    • Found high rates of acute skin toxicity, including:
      • 79% moderate to severe skin color changes
      • 22% moderate / severe desquamation
    • Nevertheless, physicians and patients alike reported satisfaction with cosmesis
  • A subsequent phase II trial involving 50 patients had minimal treatment related toxicity and excellent local control at 4-year follow-up, and post-treatment complications were thought to be less than those with more invasive techniques
  • References
    • Bush DA, Slater JD, Garberoglio C, Do S, Lum S, Slater JM. Partial breast irradiation delivered with proton beam: results of a phase II trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011;11(4):241-245.
    • Kozak KR, Smith BL, Adams J, et al. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation using proton beams: initial clinical experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(3):691-698.
    • Verma V, Mishra MV, Mehta MP. A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness studies of proton radiotherapy. Cancer. 2016;122(10):1483-1501.