SOUND Trial Findings and Discussion

  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes:
    • The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial. Gentilini et al. JAMA Oncol. 2023 Sep 21:e233759. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759
  • The SOUND trial that was published in JAMA Oncology concluded:
    • That patients with small breast cancer (less than 2 cm) and sonographically normal appearing lymph nodes:
      • Can be safely spared any axillary surgery:
        • Whenever the lack of pathological information does not affect the postoperative treatment plan
  • This study was designed to evaluate whether omission of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery in patients with negative axillary ultrasound:
    • Was noninferior to SLN surgery in terms of 5 year distant disease free survival
  • While this trial is unlikely to change practice immediately:
    • It is a thought provoking study that will likely generate multidisciplinary discussion
  • Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial:
    • Conducted at 18 European hospitals from 2012 to 2017:
      • Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and Chile:
        • Recruitment Feb 6, 2012 – Jun 30, 2017
    • Enrolled patients with invasive breast cancer up to 2 cm, cN0, planning for breast conserving surgery (BCT) and adjuvant radiation therapy (XRT) who had an axillary US showing no LN involvement on imaging:
      • If doubtful – FNA performed and had to be negative:
        • 1406 negative AUS, 57 with negative FNA
    • Patients were randomized to SLN surgery vs no axillary surgery
    • Analysis cohort:
      • 1405 women:
        • 708 SLN
        • 697 no axillary surgery
      • Median age 60
      • Tumor size 1.1 (IQR 0.8-1.5cm)
      • ER+ / Her2- disease in 87.8%
      • In the SLN group:
        • 13.7% had positive nodes on SLN:
          • 5.1% macrometases
          • 8.6% micrometastases
        • 2.0% had ≥ 2 positive SLNs, 0.6% had pN2 disease
      • Recommended adjuvant systemic therapy and radiotherapy were similar in the two groups:
        • 20.1% of SLN group and 17.5% of no axillary surgery group received chemotherapy
        • 98.0% of SLN group and 97.6% of no axillary surgery received radiation
        • 83.3% (593 pts) vs 81.1% (565 pts) had whole breast radiation over 3 to 5 weeks
        • 10.7% (76 pts) vs 10.8% (75 pts) had partial breast radiotherapy
        • 3.4% (24 pts) vs 5.6% (39 pts) had intraoperative boost of ELIOT (12 Gy) followed by a hypofractionated course of whole-breast radiotherapy (37.05 Gy in 13 fractions)
  • The study authors concluded that patients with patients with small breast cancer with sonographically normal appearing lymph nodes:
    • Can be safely spared any axillary surgery:
      • Whenever the lack of pathological information does not affect the postoperative treatment plan
  • This study provides further data:
    • Supporting that axillary sentinel lymph node surgery does not provide therapeutic benefit
  • In the no axillary surgery group:
    • The cumulative incidence of lymph node recurrences in the axilla was very low:
      • 0.4% at 5 years:
        • Despite a 13.7% rate of nodal involvement in the SLNB group
  • However, SLN surgery likely still has a role in certain patients for staging to guide adjuvant therapies:
    • In particular in young patients:
      • Where chemotherapy is associated with survival benefit for node positive disease (Rx-Ponder patient)
    • Furthermore, while adjuvant treatment recommendations in terms of rate of chemotherapy was similar between the two groups:
      • Identification of nodal positivity in ER+ breast cancer:
        • Also influences treatment options in terms of:
          • CDK4/6 inhibitor eligibility as well as consideration of extended endocrine therapy (to 10 years)
    • Many patients are interested in potential for omission of radiation therapy:
      • The trial required radiation, with 90% of patients having whole breast radiation and 10% partial breast radiation
      • Some of the patients in this trial with small breast cancers aged > 65 would be candidates for consideration of omission of radiation
      • This creates a dilemma regarding de-escalating axillary surgery leading to potential escalation of adjuvant radiation
    • It should be noted that tumor grade was not an inclusion / exclusion factor:
      • However, 18% had grade 3 disease
      • Patients with grade 3 disease have higher likelihood of nodal positivity:
        • Should omission of SLN surgery be limited to grade 1 and 2 disease at outset
        • Especially as grade 3 disease with 1 to 3 positive nodes:
          • Would make patients eligible for CDK4/6 inhibitor
  • Genomic scores were not included on this trial:
    • Most patients with ER+ / Her2- disease (with tumors > 1 cm in size) would be considered for genomic testing to guide systemic treatment recommendations
  • In summary:
    • Multidisciplinary discussion will be important before implementing any changes in practice as a result of the SOUND trial
  • I look forward to additional data from several other trials evaluating this question over the upcoming years:
    • INSEMA (published)
    • BOOG 2013-08
    • NAUTILUS

Leave a comment