- Stereotactic core-needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy:
- Is the preferred method for diagnosing DCIS
- Calcifications that appear faint on mammogram or that are deep in the breast and close to the chest wall:
- May be difficult to target with stereotactic biopsy
- In addition, use of stereotactic biopsy in patients above the weight limit of the stereotactic system (about 150 kg) and in patients with very small breasts:
- May be impossible
- Patients who cannot remain prone or who cannot cooperate for the duration of the procedure:
- Are also not good candidates for stereotactic biopsy
- Bleeding disorders and the concomitant use of anticoagulants:
- Are relative contraindications
- Biopsy specimens:
- Should be radiographed to document the sampling of suspicious microcalcifications
- Care should be taken to mark the biopsy site with a metallic clip:
- In the event that all microcalcifications are removed with the biopsy procedure
- In the final biopsy procedure report:
- It is important to report the:
- Needle gauge used
- How many cores were obtained
- An estimate as to what percentage of the calcifications was removed
- It is important to report the:
- Because stereotactic core-needle and vacuum-assisted biopsy specimens represent only a sample of an abnormality observed on mammography:
- The results are subject to sampling error
- Invasive carcinoma:
- Is found on excisional biopsy in 20% of patients:
- In whom DCIS was diagnosed by a stereotactic core-needle biopsy
- Is found on excisional biopsy in 20% of patients:
- Thus, if the core-needle biopsy results are discordant with the findings of imaging studies:
- A wire- or seed-localized excisional biopsy can be performed to establish the diagnosis
- After diagnosis using stereotactic core-needle biopsy:
- Approximately 20% to 30% of patients with ADH, up to 20% of patients with radial scar, approximately 5% to 10% of patients with flat epithelial atypia (FEA):
- Are found to have a coexistent carcinoma near the site of the biopsy:
- When complete excision is performed
- Are found to have a coexistent carcinoma near the site of the biopsy:
- Therefore, when the final pathologic studies from core-needle biopsy procedures indicate either of these diagnoses (ADH, radial scar, FEA):
- Consideration should be made for excisional biopsy:
- Though in the case of pure FEA:
- There is some evidence to suggest that surgical excision is not necessary if all calcifications are removed at the time of biopsy (Calhoun et al., 2015)
- Though in the case of pure FEA:
- Consideration should be made for excisional biopsy:
- Approximately 20% to 30% of patients with ADH, up to 20% of patients with radial scar, approximately 5% to 10% of patients with flat epithelial atypia (FEA):
- Patients who are not candidates for stereotactic biopsy or who have stereotactic biopsy results that are inconclusive or discordant with the mammographic findings:
- Should undergo excisional biopsy:
- This technique is performed with the assistance of preoperative wire or seed localization of the mammographic abnormality in conjunction with the previously placed metallic clip marking the biopsy site
- Postexcision specimen radiograph:
- Is essential to confirm the removal of microcalcifications or targeted lesion
- The excisional biopsy should be performed with the aim of obtaining a margin-negative resection:
- That can serve as the definitive surgery
- Should undergo excisional biopsy:
#Arrangoiz #CancerSurgeon #BreastSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #BreastCancer #LCIS #DCIS #DuctalCarcinomaInsitu #LobularNeoplasia #LobularCarcinomaInsitu #Surgeon #Teacher #Miami #Mexico #MSMC #MountSinaiMedicalCenter