Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma – Recurrent or Persistent Disease Management

  • Kinase inhibitors:
    • May be appropriate for select patients with recurrent or persistent MTC that is not resectable
    • Although kinase inhibitors may be recommended for patients with MTC:
      • It is important to note that kinase inhibitors:
        • May not be appropriate for patients with stable or slowly progressing indolent disease
    • Vandetanib and cabozantinib:
      • Are oral receptor kinase inhibitors:
        • That increase progression free survival (PFS):
          • In patients with metastatic MTC
  • RET inhibitors that are FDA-approved for RET-mutated MTC include:
    • Selpercatinib and pralsetinib
  • Vandetanib:
    • Is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor
    • It inhibits:
      • RET
      • Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)
      • Endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)
    • In a phase III randomized trial in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic MTC (n = 331):
      • Vandetanib increased PFS when compared with placebo (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31– 0.69; P < .001)
      • OS data are not yet available
      • A post-hoc subgroup analysis including 184 patients with symptomatic and progressive disease at baseline:
        • Also showed increased PFS (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28–0.64; P < .001) in patients who received vandetanib, compared to the placebo:
          • Although time to worsening pain was not significantly different between the two groups (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43–1.04; P = .07)
          • In this subgroup, the overall response rate (ORR) was:
            • 37% in the patients who received vandetanib and 2% in patients who received the placebo (P < .001)
    • The FDA approved the use of vandetanib for patients with locally advanced or metastatic MTC:
      • Who are not eligible for surgery and whose disease is causing symptoms or growing:
        • However, access is restricted through a vandetanib Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program:
          • Because of potential cardiac toxicity
    • The NCCN Panel recommends vandetanib (category 1):
      • As a preferred option for patients with recurrent or persistent MTC
  • Cabozantinib:
    • Is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor:
      • That inhibits:
        • RET
        • VEGFR2
        • MET
    • In a phase 3 randomized trial (EXAM) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic MTC (n = 330):
      • Cabozantinib increased median PFS when compared with placebo:
        • 11.2 vs. 4.0 months:
          • HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19–0.40; P < .001
      • Following long-term follow-up:
        • The median OS for patients treated with cabozantinib was:
          • 26.6 months compared to 21.1 months for placebo:
            • Although this difference was not statistically significant (stratified HR, 0.85; 95% CI, .64–1.12, P = .24)
    • Exploratory analyses have suggested that cabozantinib:
      • May have a greater clinical benefit:
        • For medullary thyroid cancers harboring:
          • RET M918T or RAS mutations:
            • Although prospective trials are needed to confirm
    • In 2012:
      • The FDA approved the use of cabozantinib for patients with progressive, metastatic MTC
    • The NCCN Panel recommends cabozantinib (category 1):
      • As a preferred option based on the phase III randomized trial and FDA approval
    • Rare adverse events with cabozantinib include:
      • Severe bleeding and gastrointestinal perforations or fistulas:
        • Severe hemorrhage is a contraindication for cabozantinib
  • RET mutations account for a significant percentage of MTC cases:
    • Supporting investigation into the impact of recently developed RET inhibitors on RET-mutated MTC
    • The phase I–II LIBRETTO-001 study:
      • Evaluated the efficacy of the RET inhibitor selpercatinib in 143 patients with RET-mutant MTC in patients previously treated with vandetanib or cabozantinib (n = 55):
        • The ORR and 1-year PFS rates were:
          • 69% (95% CI, 55%–81%) and 82% (95% CI, 69%–90%), respectively
      • In patients with no previous vandetanib or cabozantinib treatment (n = 88):
        • The ORR and 1year PFS rates were:
          • 73% (95% CI, 62%–82%) and 92% (95% CI, 82%– 97%), respectively
      • The most commonly reported toxicities (grade 3 and 4) were:
        • Hypertension (21%)
        • Increased alanine aminotransferase (11%)
        • Increased aspartate aminotransferase (9%)
        • Hyponatremia (8%)
        • Diarrhea (6%)
      • Dose reductions due to treatment-related adverse events were reported in 30% of patients
    • Pralsetinib, another RET inhibitor, was evaluated in the phase I–II ARROW study:
      • Which included 92 patients with RET-mutant MTC
      • The ORR was:
        • 60% (95% CI, 46%–74%) in patients previously treated with vandetanib or cabozantinib (n = 61)
        • 74% (95% CI, 49%–91%) in patients with no previous vandetanib or cabozantinib treatment (n = 22)
      • Pralsetinib was generally well-tolerated, with the most commonly reported grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events being:
        • Hypertension (11%)
        • Neutropenia (10%)
      • These results are currently reported in abstract form, and the ARROW study is ongoing and continuing to enroll patients
  • In 2020:
    • The FDA approved both of these RET inhibitors for RET-mutated MTC requiring systemic therapy
    • Based on the data and the FDA approvals:
      • The NCCN Panel recommends selpercatinib and pralsetinib:
        • As preferred options for patients with RETmutant disease
      • RET somatic genotyping may be done:
        • In patients who are germline wild-type or if germline status is unknown
  • When locoregional disease is identified in the absence of distant metastases:
    • Surgical resection is recommended with (or without) postoperative EBRT or IMRT
  • For unresectable locoregional disease that is symptomatic or progressing by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria:
    • The following options can be considered:
      • RT (EBRT or IMRT)
      • Systemic therapy
  • Treatment can be considered for symptomatic distant metastases (eg, those in bone):
    • Recommended options include:
      • Palliative resection, ablation (eg, radiofrequency, embolization), or other regional treatment
      • Vandetanib (category 1)
      • Cabozantinib (category 1)
    • These interventions may be considered for asymptomatic distant metastases (especially for progressive disease):
      • But disease monitoring is acceptable given the lack of data regarding alteration in outcome
      • If systemic therapy is indicated, then vandetanib and cabozantinib are category 1 preferred options
      • Selpercatinib or pralsetinib are preferred options for patients with RETmutation positive disease
  • Pembrolizumab is also an option for patients with:
    • TMB-H (metastatic tumor mutational burden-high [≥ 10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)]) disease:
      • Based on results of the phase II KEYNOTE-158 trial:
        • Which included two patients with thyroid cancer
  • The NCCN Panel does not recommend treatment with systemic therapy:
    • For increasing calcitonin or CEA alone
  • In the setting of symptomatic disease or progression:
    • The NCCN Panel recommends systemic therapy or enrollment in a clinical trial:
      • As stated above for locoregional disease:
        • Preferred systemic therapy options include:
          • Vandetanib (category 1)
          • Cabozantinib (category 1)
          • Selpercatinib:
            • For patients with RET-mutation positive disease
          • Pralsetinib:
            • For patients with RET-mutation positive disease
          • Other small-molecule kinase inhibitors (ie, sorafenib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, pazopanib):
            • May be considered if clinical trials or the NCCN-preferred systemic therapy options are not available or are not appropriate
  • If the patient progresses on a preferred option:
    • Then systemic chemotherapy can be administered:
      • Using dacarbazine or combinations including dacarbazine
    • Pembrolizumab is also an option for patients with TMB-H (≥10 mut/Mb) disease (useful in certain circumstances)
    • EBRT or IMRT can be used for local symptoms
    • Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy or denosumab can be considered for bone metastases
    • Best supportive care is also recommended
  • Results from clinical trials have shown:
    • The effectiveness of novel multi-targeted therapies have shown promise in the management of MTC, these include:
      • Sunitinib
      • Sorafenib
      • Lenvatinib
      • Pazopanib
  • Severe or fatal side effects from kinase inhibitors include:
    • Bleeding, hypertension, and liver toxicity:
      • However, many side effects can be managed
  • Because some patients may have indolent and asymptomatic disease:
    • Potentially toxic therapy may not be appropriate
  • Calcitonin levels decreased dramatically after vandetanib therapy:
    • Which did not directly correlate with changes in tumor volume:
      • Thus, calcitonin may not be a reliable marker of tumor response in patients receiving RET inhibitor therapy
  • A phase 2 trial in patients with progressive metastatic MTC:
    • Assessed treatment using pretargeted anti–CEA radioimmunotherapy with iodine-131:
      • OS was improved in the subset of patients with increased calcitonin doubling times

#Arrangoiz #HeadandNeckSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #ThyroidSurgeon #ThyroidExpert #CASO #Miami #CenterforAdvancedSurgicalOncology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s