- The EORTC 1081 study:
- Was a large multicenter clinical trial:
- Designed to demonstrate the safety of breast conservation therapy (BCT) compared to modified radical mastectomy (MRM):
- In patients with:
- Tumors 5 cm or smaller and
- Axillary node-negative disease
- Axillary node-positive disease
- In patients with:
- Designed to demonstrate the safety of breast conservation therapy (BCT) compared to modified radical mastectomy (MRM):
- This study was open for accrual:
- Between 1980 and 1986:
- In 8 centers in the UK, Netherlands, Belgium, and South Africa
- Four hundred and forty eight patients (448) were randomized to BCT and 420 to MRM
- Patients who received BCT:
- Were treated with lumpectomy and complete axillary clearance:
- Followed by breast radiotherapy and tumor bed boost
- Were treated with lumpectomy and complete axillary clearance:
- The primary endpoint:
- Was time to distant metastasis
- Compared to BCT:
- MRM resulted in better local control:
- But did not affect overall survival or time to distant metastasis
- MRM resulted in better local control:
- At the 20-year follow-up:
- No significant difference was noted for long-term OS:
- 44.5% MRM group vs 39.1% BCT group or time to distant metastasis
- No significant difference was noted for long-term OS:
- BCT was noted to have:
- A higher LRR at 10 years of:
- 20% versus 12% for MRM
- Additionally, factors associated with increased LRR included:
- Larger tumor size
- Lymph node metastasis
- Receptor type
- A higher LRR at 10 years of:
- Was a large multicenter clinical trial:
- Interpretation of results from EORTC 10801 trial:
- Found BCT to be a justifiable form of treatment for patients with small breast cancers:
- Given that long-term follow-up showed similar OS compared to mastectomy
- This study contributed to earlier bodies of evidence:
- Found in the NSABP B-06 and Milan I:
- Study which evaluated the safety and effectiveness of BCT for women with small breast tumors
- Found in the NSABP B-06 and Milan I:
- One of the main differences between the studies was that:
- The EORTC 10801 trial:
- Generally had patients with larger tumors (80% had T2 tumors) and 41% had lymph node metastasis
- The EORTC 10801 trial:
- Although tumor size > 2 cm and positive lymph node status:
- Were found to increase risk for distant metastasis and death:
- This was found to be independent of surgical intervention
- Were found to increase risk for distant metastasis and death:
- Thus, the EORTC 10801 trial:
- Provided valuable data that BCT can safely be performed for patients with larger tumors and positive lymph nodes
- Found BCT to be a justifiable form of treatment for patients with small breast cancers:
REFERENCES
- Black DM, Hunt KK, Mittendorf EA. Long-term outcomes reporting the safety of breast conserving therapy compared to mastectomy: 20-year results of EORTC 10801. Gland Surgery. 2013;2:120-123
- Liliere S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:412-419.
#Arrangoiz #Surgeon #BreastSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #BreastCancer #SurgicalOncologist