Axillary Radiation (AR) Instead of Undergoing an Axillary Dissection (ALND)?

shutterstock_113090875

  • The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 10981 After Mapping of the Axilla, Radiation or Surgery? (AMAROS) trial:
    • Randomized 4806:
      • Clinically node-negative
      • T1 to T2 tumors:
        • To completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiation (AR):
          • If they had positive nodes
      • Of the 1425 patients with positive sentinel nodes:
        • 744 had been randomly assigned to ALND
        • 681 to AR
      • Initially:
        • Patients with tumors 3 cm or smaller were eligible:
          • But the protocol was later modified to include:
            • Tumors up to 5 cm, multifocal tumors, or both
      • In the AR arm 21% of patients had T2 lesions
      • There were no age limits for eligibility:
        • Patients ranged from age 48 to 64 years
      • In the AR arm:
        • 42% of women were premenopausal
      • Patients who had either partial or total mastectomy were enrolled in the trial:
        • 18% of women had mastectomy
      • There was no limit on the number of positive nodes for the radiation arm:
        • But the majority of patients had 1 or 2 positive nodes
      • Crossover was allowed:
        • For patients with extensive axillary disease:
          • From the radiation arm to the dissection arm
        • Patients in the dissection arm who had 4 or more positive nodes:
          • Where allowed to have axillary radiation
          • Four percent of patients who stayed in the radiation arm had 3 positive nodes, and 1% had 4 or more positive nodes.
      • Importantly:
        • In the axillary dissection arm:
          • 25% of patients had an additional 1 to 3 positive nodes (in addition to the positive sentinel nodes) at dissection
          • 8% had 4 or more additional positive nodes
        • Since it was a randomized trial:
          • We can assume the same numbers were present in the radiation arm:
            • So these patients did not necessarily have low-volume axillary disease.
      • Axillary radiotherapy (RT) included:
        • The contents of all 3 levels of the axilla and the medial part of the supraclavicular fossa
        • The prescribed dose was 25 fractions of 2 Gy each
        • For patients in the AR arm who had mastectomy:
          • Radiation to the chest wall in addition to the axilla was optional but not mandatory
      • There were no significant differences:
        • In 5-year overall survival or disease-free survival between the two arms:
          • At 6.1 years of follow-up:
            • There was no significant difference:
              • In the rate of axillary failure:
                • 0.43% ALND vs 1.19% RT
          • At 5-year follow-up there was a significant difference:
            • In clinical signs of lymphedema between the groups:
              • 23% in ALND vs. 11% in AR:
                • There was greater than a 10% difference in arm size compared to the contralateral arm:
                  • In 13% of the ALND arm and 5% of the AR arm
  • The AMAROS study findings would suggest that axillary RT is an appropriate alternative to ALND in patients with a positive sentinel node:
    • However, the clinical characteristics of the AMAROS cohort are remarkably similar to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 cohort:
      • With 80% of AMAROS patients having:
        • A tumor less than 2 cm
      • 90% patients:
        • Receiving any systemic therapy
      • 95% of patients:
        • Having only 1 to 2 positive sentinel nodes
    • Patients in ACOSOG Z0011 treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy only demonstrated:
      • Similar 5-year rates of regional recurrence as the AMAROS patients receiving axillary RT:
        • 0.9% [ACOSOG Z0011] vs 1.2% [EORTC 10981 AMAROS axillary RT]):
          • Thus, while AMAROS indicates that sentinel node biopsy and nodal RT is an alternative to ALND:
            • It does not demonstrate that RT is necessary in all patients with a positive sentinel node:
              • Particularly in those treated with breast-conserving surgery
    • The decision to include axillary RT in patients with 1 to 2 positive sentinel nodes:
      • Should be tailored to the individual:
        • Taking into account other clinical factors which may place the patient at higher risk for locoregional recurrence

0405MorrowTable

img_0832-2img_0833-2img_0834-2img_0835-2img_0836-2img_0837-2

#Arrangoiz

#Teacher

#Surgeon

#Cirujano

#SurgicalOncologist

#CirujanoOncologo

#CancerSurgeon

#CirujanodeCancer

#BreastSurgeon

#BreastCancer

#CancerdeMama

#CirujanodeMama

Leave a comment