Buccal Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Surgical anatomy of the buccal region

  • The buccal mucosa:
    • Is the mucosal lining of the inner surface of the cheek
    • The area extends from:
      • The oral commisure anteriorly to the retromolar trigone posteriorly:
        • The junction between the buccal mucosa and retromolar trigone:
          • Is an arbitrary line drawn from the maxillary tuberosity to the distobuccal aspect of the mandibular third molar (or its anticipated position if not present)
    • The inferior and superior boundaries of the area are delineated by:
      • The mandibular and maxillary gingivobuccal sulci, respectively
  • The buccal mucosa is not exposed to masticatory loads:
    • So is covered by a lining mucosa with nonkeratinizing stratified squamous epithelium:
      • The mucosa is firmly attached to the underlying buccinator muscle
      • Minor salivary glands are located within the cheek (submucosa)
  • The parotid duct:
    • Pierces the buccinator muscle to enter the oral cavity adjacent to the second maxillary molar tooth
  • Sensory innervation to the area:
    • Is via the buccal branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve
  • Lymphatic drainage of the site:
    • Is via the ipsilateral facial and submandibular nodes:
      • To the deep cervical chain
  • The thickness of the cheek, from mucosal lining to external skin:
    • Is 1 cm to 3 cm
  • Epidemiology
    • The buccal mucosa is the most common site for oral cancer:
      • In South East Asia:
        • Up to 40% of oral cancers arising at this site
      • This contrasts with North America and Western Europe:
        • Where buccal carcinoma only accounts for 2% to 10% of oral carcinomas
    • The consumption of betel quid:
      • Is socially and culturally embedded in the countries of South East Asia:
        • It is responsible for the difference in site predilection
      • The ingredients of betel quid (paan / paan masala) varies throughout South East Asia:
        • The main ingredients include:
          • The piper betel leaf
          • Slaked lime
          • Spices
          • Tobacco
          • Areca nut
      • For many years, the tobacco content alone was credited as being the carcinogenic agent in betel quid:
        • However it is now recognized that the areca nut is also carcinogenic:
          • As well as being the main etiological agent in:
            • Oral submucous fibrosis
        • Individuals who consume betel quid frequently have a preference regarding which side they chew betel:
          • This corresponding to the side of tumor development
        • There is a strong association with smoking and alcohol consumption:
          • In populations where betel chewing is not prevalent
  • The male-to-female ratio:
    • In Western countries approximates 1:1:
      • However in South East Asia the ratio reflects the consumption of betel quid
    • In India, the male-to-female ratio:
      • Is approximately 4:1
    • In the Taiwanese population, where betel quid use occurs primarily in the male population:
      • The ratio may be as high as 27:1
  • Buccal carcinoma typically occurs over the age of 40 years:
    • Although it may occur in younger patients:
      • Particularly when associated with the habit of betel chewing
  • Presentation:
    • Buccal carcinoma may be described as:
      • Verrucous, exophytic or ulceroinfiltrative in character
Squamous cell carcinoma buccal mucosa of verrucous appearance
Squamous cell carcinoma buccal mucosa of ulceroinfiltrative appearance
  • Presentation of buccal carcinoma of the oral cavity:
    • Patients may present with:
      • Pain
      • An intraoral mass
      • Ulceration
      • Trismus
    • Patients who chew betel often have areas of:
      • Erythroleukoplakia of the buccal mucosa or submucous fibrosis and consequent trismus:
        • Making the detection of invasive squamous cell carcinoma difficult
    • Advanced buccal carcinomas may extend into adjacent sites to include:
      • External skin, mandible or maxilla
    • It is not unusual for patients to present with advanced disease:
      • 40% or more presenting with stage III / IV disease
      • Palpable lymphadenopathy on presentation:
        • May be as high as 57% for T3 / T4 lesions
      • Occult nodal metastasis:
        • May be present in 26% of those who are clinically N0 at presentation:
          • Tumors greater than T2, are poorly differentiated, have a poor lymphocytic response or are thicker than 5 mm:
            • Are more likely to demonstrate cervical metastasis
        • Tumors are usually well differentiated
  • Work up:
    • Biopsies of buccal carcinomas should be of sufficient depth to help the pathologist give an indication of depth of invasion:
      • Since this will help decide on management of the neck
    • Buccal carcinoma may rapidly extend to adjacent sites:
      • Thus accurate imaging is required:
        • Most patients will require MRI / CT imaging:
          • Augmented with ultrasound scan if necessary to help in the assessment of depth of primary and cervical lymphadenopathy
  • Treatment
    • Primary site:
      • Traditional treatment of buccal carcinoma is:
        • Surgery with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for selected patients
      • T1 / T2 disease:
        • Can typically be resected perorally
      • T3 / T4 disease:
        • May require facial access incisions and bony resection of the maxilla and / or mandible
      • The primary tumor should be resected with:
        • A 1 cm margin and up to 2 cm if skin is involved
        • The buccinator muscle:
          • Should be included as the deep margin at the very least
        • The parotid duct:
          • May need to be repositioned or ligated
        • External skin should be taken with the specimen:
          • If there is any evidence clinically or on imaging that it is involved
        • Partial maxillectomy or mandibular resection (rim (marginal) or segmental) may be required.
      • Small T1 tumors:
        • May be resected and reconstructed by primary closure
        • Healing by secondary intention may be considered:
          • However postoperative trismus may be anticipated:
            • Unless vigorous mouth opening exercises are conducted
        • Split thickness skin grafts may be used:
          • The use of silicone sheets to stabilize the graft being useful
          • The use of a skin graft to reconstruct deeper resections:
            • May leave a very thin cheek with potentially poor aesthetics
        • Local flaps such as:
          • The buccal fat pad or temporoparietal fascial flap:
            • May be used for reconstruction if tumor extension does not compromise their use
        • Microvascular free flap reconstruction with a radial free forearm flap or anterolateral thigh flap:
          • Restores the thickness of the cheek and if external skin is involved:
            • The flaps can be bipaddled to provide reconstruction of mucosal and skin surfaces
      • T4 tumors requiring segmental resection of the mandible:
        • May require composite free flap reconstruction
      • Reconstruction with a radial free forearm flap:
        • Has been shown to give better postoperative mouth opening than reconstruction with a split skin graft or buccal fat pad
Squamous cell carcinoma buccal mucosa
Radial free forearm flap reconstruction
  • Radiotherapy:
    • As a single treatment modality for T1 / T2 tumors has been advocated:
      • However, a change of practice from radiotherapy to surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was associated with improved prognosis
    • Brachytherapy or external beam irradiation may be considered
  • Management of the Neck:
    • Regional spread of disease in buccal carcinoma is usually to:
      • The ipsilateral level I and II lymph nodes
    • Patients with palpable lymphadenopathy or pathological nodes on imaging:
      • Should have a comprehensive neck dissection:
        • Although if pathological nodes are only located in level I, a level I to III selective neck dissection (SND) may be considered
      • Nodes in the region of the facial artery as it crosses the mandible:
        • Should be removed with the neck dissection specimen
    • Patients with a cN0 neck:
      • With a T2 or greater primary tumors or tumors with a thickness greater than 5 mm:
        • Should have an elective neck dissection:
          • Some institutions will conduct an elective neck dissection (END) if the tumor is 3 to 4 mm thick or if histological examination of the tumor demonstrates lymphatic infiltration
  • PORT:
    • The indications for postoperative radiotherapy to the loco-regional area are similar to other sites:
      • Notably two or more nodes in the neck, extracapsular spread (ECS), positive margins or stage III / IV disease
    • The beneficial role of PORT in selected patients with buccal carcinoma has been demonstrated by several authors:
      • Some authors suggest that PORT should be considered even in stage I and II disease, or tumors greater than 10 mm thick
  • Recurrence:
    • Recurrence rates for buccal carcinoma are 26% to 80%:
      • Usually occurring within two years
    • Involvement of the parotid duct and buccinator muscle:
      • Have not been found to be significant indicators of recurrence
    • Factors that influence recurrence include:
      • Tumor thickness and tumor differentiation
#Arrangoiz #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #HeadandNeckSurgeon #MountSinaiMedicalCenter #Miami #Doctor #Surgeon #Mexico

Outcomes, Follow-up and Surveillance of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC) of the Breast

  • Outcomes and prognosis in ILC are generally favorable:
    • Consistent with the luminal A phenotype
  • The majority of evidence supporting similar or better survival as IDC:
    • These include a large SEER study of 263,408 women (27,639 with ILC and 235,769 with IDC) treated between 1993 and 2003:
      • A stage-matched analysis showed that ILC was more likely to be:
        • Greater than 2 cm
        • Lymph node positive
        • ER positive
      • The 5-year disease-free survival was significantly better for ILC than for IDC after matching for stage:
        • With an overall 14% survival benefit (HR 0.86) identified on multivariable analysis
      • As such, although overall stage-corrected prognosis appears to be favorable, some propose that this may be offset by a higher stage at presentation and higher rates
        of late metastatic recurrences
        , often occurring in atypical sites
    • The pleomorphic subtype of ILC is:
      • Also a known exception to the generally favorable prognosis, having been shown in retrospective series to more frequently develop metastatic disease than other nonpleomorphic ILCs
  • Currently, there are no unique specifications for surveillance of ILC:
    • For all treated nonmetastatic breast cancers, NCCN guidelines recommend a history and physical examination one to four times per year as clinically appropriate for 5 years and then annually
    • Annual mammography should be performed for patients treated with BCT
    • The role of MRI in surveillance is unclear and presently recommended only for those with a lifetime risk greater than 20% of developing a second primary breast cancer
  • Adherence to hormonal therapy should be encouraged for those prescribed and yearly gynecologic assessment arranged for those without a previous hysterectomy
  • Signs of disease recurrence, either locoregional or systemic, should prompt evaluation with appropriate laboratory work and diagnostic imaging, which may include diagnostic
    CT or fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans followed by biopsy to prove first recurrence of disease
  • It should be noted that the generally low-grade nature of ILC may limit the sensitivity of traditional PET/CT scans, and studies are ongoing for the use of alternative radiotracers using ER ligands for
    increased sensitivity
  • Confirmed LRRs (those of the breast / chest wall and / or regional lymph nodes alone):
    • Can be managed with complete surgical resection and systemic therapy
  • Distant metastatic disease (stage IV) is managed with individualized systemic therapy

Radiation Therapy for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

  • Considerations for radiation therapy (RT) in locoregional control, once more generally common among the ductal and lobular cancer types, are summarized here (Figure)
  • Adjuvant whole breast RT:
    • Reduces the risk of both local regional recurrence (LRR) and death from breast cancer after BCS and is a necessary element of BCT
  • Additional regional nodal irradiation:
    • May also be indicated for those with involved lymph nodes or high-risk tumors
  • It is noteworthy that it may be acceptable to omit RT:
    • Among elderly women with select low-risk, ER-positive tumors:
      • Data to support this include the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALBG) 9343 randomized trial of women age 70 years or older with stage I ER-positive cancers treated with lumpectomy and tamoxifen with or without RT:
        • Which demonstrated no advantage in
          overall survival
          :
          • Although there was a small improvement in LRR among those treated with RT
  • Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI):
    • Is a newer technique involving more focused RT
      delivered in higher doses over a shorter time span
    • Notably, the recent American Society for
      Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guideline update cites lobular histology as a criterion for “cautionary” use of APBI outside of a clinical trial
  • Postmastectomy RT:
    • May also benefit selected patients, a decision generally made by consideration of the presence of:
      • Macrometastatic nodal involvement
      • Large tumor size
      • High-risk disease features
    • It is important to note that the implications of margins at mastectomy remain controversial among radiation oncologists, and there are no data to support a definite benefit of postmastectomy RT in patients with close margins
    • Similar to surgical and systemic therapy trials, ILC patients comprise a minority in postmastectomy RT trials
    • A recent study using Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data including 12,703 ILC patients treated from 2004 to 2009, of which 26% had a definite indication for postmastectomy RT:
      • Found an improvement in 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival from 80.9% to 84.7% (p = .0003) among ILC patients, a benefit to the same degree as IDC:
        • These data support continued decision
          making for radiotherapy using existing criteria, regardless of cancer histology

What Lymph Node Levels does a Lateral [Therapeutic] Neck Dissection for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) Include?

  • What lymph node levels does a lateral [therapeutic] neck dissection for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTX) include?
  • Although the rate of clinical nodal involvement in the lateral compartment was initially described by the Japanese (Noguchi et al. 1970) and Germans (Gimm et al. 1998):
    • Sivanandan et al (2001) were the first to systematize it by levels
  • In 2013, the Canadian group of Jeremy L. Freeman (Eskander et al. Thyroid) conducted a systematic review that included the meta-analysis of 18 publications (including his 2012 retrospective work with 185 patients; Merdad et al. Head Neck) agglutinating 1298 lateral neck dissections for DTC:
  • Emptying of sublevel IIb (retrospinal recess):
    • Is usually indicated when clinical, radiological or macroscopic involvement:
      • Is evident intraoperatively
    • Macroscopic involvement evident in the intraoperative sublevel IIa:
      • Usually determines the addition of sublevel IIb to the neck dissection
  • Skip metastases” within the lateral compartment are uncommon and occur in around 9% of patients:
    • Level II with level III and IV
    • Level V with level III and IV
      • (Merdad et al. 2012)
  • Selective lymphadenectomy IIa to Vb:
    • Currently dissects levels IIa, III, IV, Vb and the “infraspinal” portion of the VA [VAi] in order to avoid the functional sequelae of cranial nerve XI dissection
  • Although heterogeneity was a constant in all comparisons by levels (I2: 31% to 87%), it is the best evidence to date that justifies the use of selective emptying IIa-Vb in this cohort of patients with this pathology:
    • Level III is the most frequently compromised
  • The majority (73%) of patients have more than one level involved:
    • Level III and IV: 46%
    • Level II, III and IV: 26%
    • Level III, IV and V: 11%
    • Level II, III, IV and V: 13%
      • (Merdad et al. 2012)
    • Levels I and sublevel Va (cranial to the distal spinal nerve pathway):
      • Are rarely involved, usually in patients with high disease volume and multilevel invasion

Hereditary Breast Cancer

  • The list of cancer-associated genes continues to expand, and it is therefore increasingly important to obtain a thorough family history to assess any potential for hereditary cancer syndromes:
    • The BRCA1 and 2 genes account for the majority of hereditary breast cancer cases
  • The BRCA1 gene is located on chromosome 17q21:
    • It is part of the DNA repair pathway:
      • Functioning as a tumor suppressor gene
    • Presence of a deleterious BRCA1 mutation is associated with:
      • A lifetime breast cancer risk of:
        • 72% by age 80
      • A lifetime ovarian cancer risk of:
        • 44%
    • In addition, BRCA1 mutations have been associated with:
      • An increased risk of pancreatic cancer and melanoma
    • BRCA1 associated breast cancers:
      • Tend to occur at younger ages and are more likely to have aggressive phenotypes compared to non-BRCA-associated tumors
  • Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome:
    • Is caused by genetic mutations in the mismatch repair system:
      • With the most common associated gene mutations being MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2
    • Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary form of colorectal cancer, and is also associated with an increased risk of:
      • Endometrial, urogenital, pancreatic, biliary tract and ovarian cancers:
        • Women with Lynch syndrome have a 20% to 60% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer
  • Germline mutations in the PTEN gene:
    • Are associated with Cowden syndrome:
      • Characterized by the formation of multiple hamartomas as well as an increased risk of:
        • Breast, endometrial, non-medullary thyroid, and renal cell cancers
  • Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome:
    • Is associated with a mutation in the CDH1 gene
    • It leads to an increased risk of early onset gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer
  • PALB2 is a breast cancer susceptibility gene:
    • With an estimated breast cancer risk of 45%:
    • PALB2 mutations have also been reported to increase the risk of:
      • Ovarian cancer and possibly pancreatic and prostate cancer
  • BRIP1 mutations:
    • Have been shown to confirm a high-risk of ovarian cancer (OR 20.97), but no increase in breast cancer risk
  • References
    • Shulman LP. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): clinical features and counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2, Lynch syndrome, Cowden syndrome, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010;37(1):109-133, Table of Contents.
    • Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, et al. Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Jama. 2017;317(23):2402-2416.
    • Mersch J, Jackson MA, Park M, et al. Cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations other than breast and ovarian. Cancer. 2015;121(2):269-275.
    • Southey MC, Winship I, Nguyen-Dumont T. PALB2: research reaching to clinical outcomes for women with breast cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2016;14:9.
    • Weber-Lassalle N, Hauke J, Ramser J, et al. BRIP1 loss-of-function mutations confer high risk for familial ovarian cancer, but not familial breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20(1):7.
#Arrangoiz #Doctor #Surgeon #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #BreastSurgeon #MountSiniaMedicalCenter #MSMC #Miami #Mexico #BreastCancer

Lymph Node Dissection in Thyroid Cancer

  • Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC):
    • Has a high predilection for spread to locoregional lymph nodes (LNs):
      • Occurring in up to 40% to 90% of cases:
        • When prophylactic nodal dissection is performed:
        • Though such high rates of metastatic disease may prove enticing to recommend routine prophylactic node dissection:
          • Recurrence-free survival is not effected by the removal of sonographically normal, microscopically diseased nodes
        • Instead, prophylactic central neck dissection may be individually considered for those patients with:
          • T3 or T4 tumors, or in the presence of lateral neck metastases
        • Clinically suspicious or biopsy-proven nodal disease warrants a “therapeutic” dissection of the involved compartments
          • “Berry picking,” or selective removal of suspicious LN metastases, is not recommended:
            • As it is associated with significantly higher recurrence rates and does not lower the rate of postoperative complications compared with systematic compartmental dissections
  • The risk of surgical complications with nodal dissection should be weighed against the benefit of LN removal:
    • Central neck dissections may result in temporary or permanent injury to the RLN and hypoparathyroidism
    • Surgeon case volume predicts patient outcomes:
      • Those performing less than 10 cases compared with those performing more than 100 cases per year had complications in 24% and 14.5% of cases, respectively
    • Although dissection of the lateral neck is less often associated with adverse events:
      • Injury to the spinal accessory nerve may occur with dissection of level II or V
    • Similarly, chyle leaks may be seen after removal of nodes in level IV:
      • Particularly on the left side
#Arrangoiz #Surgeon #Doctor #Surgeon #CancerSurgeon #ThyroidSurgeon #ParathyroidSurgeon #HeadandNeckSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #Miami #Mexico #MountSinaiMedicalCenter #MSMC #ThyroidCancer

Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Suppression Therapy after Thyroid Cancer Surgery

  • Historically:
    • Almost all patients were given thyroid hormone:
      • To fully suppress serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)
    • The rationale for this approach:
      • Was based on the theory that TSH is a stimulant for thyroid cell proliferation and suppression of thyrotropin will inhibit tumor growth:
        • Indeed, early studies supported the role of TSH suppression in reducing the likelihood of disease progression and improving survival:
          • Particularly in those with high-risk disease
        • More recent analyses, however, have failed to demonstrate a benefit of such suppressive therapy in those with low-risk tumors:
          • In fact, such treatment may prove harmful
        • A long-term observational study showed a three-fold increased risk of cardiovascular death for each ten-fold reduction in mean TSH level
        • Patients with subclinical thyrotoxicosis:
          • Are also at increased risk of atrial fibrillation, ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and impaired cardiac reserve
          • Additionally, bone turnover may be adversely affected by suppressive doses of levothyroxine:
            • Higher rates of osteoporosis may be seen in thyroid cancer patients:
              • There is an increased risk of fracture when suppressive doses of levothyroxine are used
    • As a consequence of the myriad negative effects of excess levothyroxine:
      • The target TSH range should be determined on an individual basis
      • It is also worthy of note that lowering TSH to undetectable levels probably does not confer additional benefit beyond that seen with less aggressive suppression below 0.1 mU/L
      • The optimal TSH range should consider the initial risk for recurrence, the response to therapy, and the risk for thyrotoxicosis-related morbidities in the individual patient
      • Furthermore, this target TSH for the individual patient may evolve over time, depending on the response to therapy

Data from Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133.
#Arrangoiz #ThyroidCancer #ThyroidSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #Doctor #Surgeon #HeadandNeckSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #EndocrineSurgery #Miami #Mexico #MountSianiMedicalCenter #MSMC

American Thyroid Association Response to Therapy Classification in Thyroid Cancer

  • Excellent Response to Therapy:
    • Patients with no biochemical (unstimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) < 0.2 or stimulated Tg < 1.0 ng/mL) or radiographic evidence of disease are classified as having an excellent response to therapy
    • Patients with an initial low to intermediate risk of recurrence who meet these criteria:
      • Are recommended to have serum Tg monitored every 12 to 24 months
    • Patients with initially high-risk disease:
      • Should continue to have a serum Tg measurement at least every 6 to 12 months
  • Biochemical Incomplete Response to Therapy:
    • Patients who have undergone total thyroidectomy and remnant ablation and have an unstimulated serum Tg > 1 ng/mL or a stimulated Tg > 10 ng/mL or a rising thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) titer with negative imaging:
      • Are classified as having a biochemical incomplete response to therapy
    • Such patients should undergo imaging with sonography of the neck:
      • If the disease is unable to be located:
        • Cross-sectional imaging of the neck and chest should be performed
    • Serum Tg should be followed at least every 6 to 12 months.
  • Structural Incomplete Response to Therapy:
    • Those patients with structurally or functionally (on diagnostic whole-body scan [DxWBS] or 18(FDG-PET) evident disease are classified as:
      • Having a structural incomplete response to therapy
    • Unfortunately, the majority of patients in this category will have persistent disease in spite of additional treatments
    • Disease-specific death rates are high in this group:
      • 11% with locoregional metastases
      • 50% with distant metastases
  • Indeterminate Response to Therapy:
    • Patients with biochemical or structural findings that cannot be confidently classified as either excellent response or persistent disease:
      • Are deemed as having an indeterminate response to therapy
    • Such patients may be carefully followed with biochemical testing and serial imaging to better delineate which category is ultimately appropriate
    • It is estimated that up to 20% of these patients will eventually develop conclusive evidence of disease requiring additional therapy
#Arrangoiz #Doctor #Surgeon #ThyroidSurgeon #ParathyroidSurgeon #HeadandNeckSurgeon #CancerSurgeon #MountSinaiMedicalCenter #MSMC #Miami #Mexico #ThyroidCancer