My name is Rodrigo Arrangoiz I am a breast surgeon/ thyroid surgeon / parathyroid surgeon / head and neck surgeon / surgical oncologist that works at Center for Advanced Surgical Oncology in Miami, Florida.
I was trained as a surgeon at Michigan State University from (2005 to 2010) where I was a chief resident in 2010. My surgical oncology and head and neck training was performed at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia from 2010 to 2012. At the same time I underwent a masters in science (Clinical research for health professionals) at the University of Drexel. Through the International Federation of Head and Neck Societies / Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center I performed a two year head and neck surgery and oncology / endocrine fellowship that ended in 2016.
Mi nombre es Rodrigo Arrangoiz, soy cirujano oncólogo / cirujano de tumores de cabeza y cuello / cirujano endocrino que trabaja Center for Advanced Surgical Oncology en Miami, Florida.
Fui entrenado como cirujano en Michigan State University (2005 a 2010 ) donde fui jefe de residentes en 2010. Mi formación en oncología quirúrgica y e n tumores de cabeza y cuello se realizó en el Fox Chase Cancer Center en Filadelfia de 2010 a 2012. Al mismo tiempo, me sometí a una maestría en ciencias (investigación clínica para profesionales de la salud) en la Universidad de Drexel. A través de la Federación Internacional de Sociedades de Cabeza y Cuello / Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center realicé una sub especialidad en cirugía de cabeza y cuello / cirugia endocrina de dos años que terminó en 2016.
The molecular classification of melanoma, considering the increasing incidence rates projected for 2025 in the United States and the associated risk factors such as ultraviolet (UV) exposure, demographic changes, and genetic predispositions:
Is primarily based on the genetic alterations and the degree of cumulative sun damage (CSD)
Low-CSD Melanomas:
These include superficial spreading melanomas and nodular melanomas:
Which are often characterized by BRAF mutations, particularly the BRAFV600E variant
These melanomas are typically associated with:
Intermittent, intense UV exposure
High-CSD Melanomas:
These include lentigo maligna melanomas and desmoplastic melanomas
They often have a high mutation burden and can harbor:
NRAS mutations, TP53 mutations, and other non-V600E BRAF mutations
These melanomas are associated with chronic, cumulative UV exposure
Non-CSD Melanomas:
These include acral lentiginous melanomas and mucosal melanomas:
Which usually do not show BRAF, NRAS, or NF1 mutations (triple wild-type)
However, they may have mutations in C-KIT, GNAQ, or GNA11 genes
These melanomas are not related to UV exposure
Familial Melanomas:
These are often associated with germline mutations in genes such as:
CDKN2A and MC1R:
Which significantly increase melanoma risk
These genetic changes are inherited and present in all body cells
The molecular classification of melanoma is crucial for guiding targeted therapies and improving patient outcomes:
For instance, BRAF inhibitors (e.g., vemurafenib, dabrafenib) and MEK inhibitors (e.g., trametinib):
Are effective in treating melanomas with BRAF mutations, while immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab) have shown efficacy across various melanoma subtypes
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (8th Edition) for thin melanomas (less than or equal to 1 mm):
Includes both tumor thickness and ulceration as distinguishing features of a stage 1a and stage 1b melanoma
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society for Surgical Oncology (SSO) jointly developed evidence-based recommendations for the use of SLN biopsy for patients with melanoma:
The guidelines note that SLN biopsy is recommended for:
All patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (between 1 and 4 mm):
Studies have shown that SLN biopsy is useful for identifying nodal metastases in these patients:
Who account for about one-third of all melanoma cases
SLN biopsy detects cancer in the sentinel nodes in about:
18% to 26% of patients
The majority of melanomas are thin (1 mm thick) and usually can be cured simply by wide local excision of the primary tumor:
The incidence of tumor-positive SLN biopsy among patients with thin melanomas is approximately 5%
Although SLN biopsy is not necessary in most cases:
The guideline recommendations note that it should be discussed and considered for selected patients with:
Thin melanomas (0.8mm to 1mm)
Those with melanomas < 0.8mm and possess high-risk factors:
Such as:
Ulceration
A mitotic rate of 1/ mm2
Wong et al:
Evaluated the results of SLN biopsy in 223 patients with thin melanomas and found nodal metastasis to be uncommon among patients with:
Melanomas less than 0.75 mm thick
Less than Clark level IV
References:
Wong SL, Faries MB, Kennedy EB, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:399-413.
Wong SL, Brady MS, Busam KJ, Coit DG. Results of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol.;2006;13:302-309.
A tumor bed boost has consistently been shown to reduce rates of local recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery:
However, limited data have been available for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
Moran et al. retrospectively evaluated 4,131 patients with DCIS:
Finding that the addition of a tumor bed boost:
Reduced ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences, with the benefit being:
0.8% at 5 years
1.6% at 10 years
3.6% at 15 years
The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has published guidelines on the use of a tumor bed boost following whole-breast irradiation:
It is important to note that the range of boost doses depend on surgical margins following lumpectomy
References
Bartelink H, Maingon P, Poortmans PM, et al. Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):47-56.
Romestaing P, Lehingue Y, Carrie C, et al. Role of a 10-Gy boost in the conservative treatment of early breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial in Lyon, France. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):963-968.
Moran MS, Zhao Y, Ma S, et al. Association of radiotherapy boost for ductal carcinoma in situ with local control after whole-breast radiotherapy. JAMA Oncol.2017;3(8):1060-1068.
Smith BD, Bellon JR, Blitzblau R, et al. Radiation therapy for the whole breast: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8(3):145-152.
Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016;6(5):287-295.
An experienced dermatopathologist is an important member of the multidisciplinary melanoma team:
That contributes to the accurate diagnosis and staging of patients with melanoma
It is my practice to have outside biopsies reviewed by our pathology staff upon referral to confirm diagnosis
Although the pathologic analysis primarily consists of microscopic examination of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained tumor:
Several melanocytic cell markers may also be useful to confirm the diagnosis
Two antibodies that have been widely used in immunohistochemical evaluations are:
S-100 and HMB-45:
S-100 is expressed not only by more than 90% of melanomas:
But also by several other tumors and some normal tissues, including dendritic cells
In contrast, the monoclonal antibody HMB-45:
Is relatively specific (yet not as sensitive) for proliferative melanocytic cells and melanoma
It is therefore often used as a confirmatory stain when the diagnosis of melanoma is being considered
Anti–MART-1 staining has also been shown to be very useful in the diagnosis of melanoma:
Antityrosinase and Sox10 may also be used
The major histomorphologic components that should be included in a primary melanoma pathology report include:
Breslow thickness
Ulceration status
Peripheral and deep margin status
Mitotic rate:
Using the dermal hot spot approach with units of mitoses per mm2
Other features that are often also recorded include:
Presence of microsatellites
Histologic subtype
Lymphovascular invasion
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)
Regression
Neurotropism
Growth phase
The absence of epidermal component:
As the latter may represent an uncommon dermal primary or a metastatic deposit
The major histomorphologic types of melanoma:
Superficial spreading melanomas:
Constitute the majority of melanomas:
Approximately 70% of melanomas
Generally arise in a pre-existing nevus
Nodular melanomas:
Are the second most common type:
15% to 30% of melanoma
Nodular melanomas progress to invasiveness more quickly than other types:
However, when depth of the melanoma is controlled for:
Nodular melanomas are generally associated with the same prognosis as other lesions:
Although at least one recent study suggests that a thin (T1) nodular melanoma may be associated with worse prognosis than T1 superficial spreading-type melanoma
Lentigo maligna melanomas:
Constitute a small percentage of melanomas:
4% to 10%
These lesions occur in sun-exposed areas
Lentigo maligna melanomas are classically located on:
The faces of older white women
In general, lentigo maligna melanomas are:
Large (> 3 cm at diagnosis)
Flat lesions
Are uncommon in individuals younger than 50 years
Given their often-ill-defined appearance:
Margin control can sometimes be challenging at the time of wide excision
Acral lentiginous melanomas:
Occur on the palms (palmar), soles (plantar), or beneath the nail beds (subungual):
Although not all palmar, plantar, and subungual melanomas:
Are acral lentiginous melanomas
These melanomas account for only 2% to 8% of melanomas in white patients:
But for a substantially higher proportion of melanomas (35% to 60%) in darker-skinned patients
They are often large:
With an average diameter of approximately 3 cm
Their clinical extent at the primary site may be difficult to define, and scouting biopsies are sometimes employed to facilitate clinical assessment of the extent of disease
Amelanotic melanomas:
Are relatively uncommon melanomas that occur without pigmentation changes
They are often more difficult to diagnose because of their lack of pigmentation
Factors such as:
Change in size
Asymmetry
Irregular borders may suggest malignancy and prompt a biopsy, but delays in diagnosis may sometimes be observed
While melanoma has been traditionally described using these categories:
Prognosis is more dependent upon staging than by these histomorphologic types
Boost radiation therapy is an additional dose of radiation delivered to the tumor bed after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients who undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The goal is to reduce local recurrence rates. The decision to give a boost is typically based on patient-specific risk factors.
Indications for Boost Radiation after BCS
1. Age < 50 years (especially < 40 years)
Data: The EORTC 22881–10882 trial (Bartelink et al., 2001; 2007 update) Population: 5,318 women with stage I/II breast cancer who received BCS + WBI (50 Gy) ± boost (16 Gy). Results: 10-year local recurrence (LR): Without boost: 10.2% With boost: 6.2% (Absolute reduction: 4%, p < 0.0001) Age stratification: < 40 years: LR reduced from 24% to 14% with boost (10% absolute benefit) 41–50 years: LR reduced from 11.7% to 6.4% (5.3% absolute benefit) 50 years: Less pronounced benefit
2. Positive or Close Surgical Margins
Rationale: Tumor cells may remain near the excision cavity, increasing recurrence risk. Guideline Support: NCCN recommends a boost for positive margins (even if re-excised) or if final margins are close, particularly in young patients.
3. High-Grade Tumors (Grade 3)
Data: High-grade tumors are more biologically aggressive and associated with higher LR rates. Boost helps reduce recurrence in these patients, especially when combined with other risk factors (young age, close margins).
4. Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI)
LVI is a marker for higher local and regional recurrence risk. While not an absolute indication, it adds weight to the decision in a patient with other risk factors.
5. Extensive Intraductal Component (EIC)
Especially in younger patients, an EIC increases the risk of residual disease and LR.
6. Triple-negative or HER2-positive subtypes (in younger patients)
While molecular subtype alone isn’t a formal indication for boost, aggressive biology may influence the decision when combined with other features (e.g., young age, LVI, close margins).
Guidelines
ASTRO 2016: Endorses boost in patients <50 years or with high-risk features. NCCN 2024: Recommends consideration of boost based on age, margin status, histology, grade, and LVI.
Clinical Takeaway
Boost radiation significantly reduces local recurrence in high-risk patients following breast-conserving surgery. The greatest benefit is seen in younger women and those with adverse pathological features.
Let me know if you’d like a one-slide summary for a presentation.
Varies according to the anatomical site as well as the size and shape of the lesion
Particular attention should be placed on the impact of the biopsy:
On definitive surgical treatment
Either an excisional biopsy or an incisional biopsy using a scalpel or punch is acceptable
Punch biopsies can be performed for most lesions:
They should generally be performed at the most raised or darkest area of the lesion to sample the most aggressive area of the potential melanoma
Full-thickness biopsy into the subcutaneous tissue:
Should be performed to ensure accurate staging of the lesion
An excisional biopsy allows the pathologist to accurately determine the thickness of the lesion, since the entire lesion is available for evaluation:
Excisional biopsies should be performed when the lesion is too large for a punch:
But still can be removed without excessive surgical intervention
For excisional biopsies, a narrow margin of normal-appearing skin (1 to 2 mm) is generally taken with the specimen:
An elliptical incision is often used to facilitate closure
The biopsy incision should be oriented to facilitate later wide excision (e.g., axially on extremities) and minimize the need for a skin graft to provide wound closure at the time of wide excision
Shave biopsy:
Is generally discouraged if a diagnosis of melanoma is being considered since incomplete assessment of tumor thickness may result if the deep margin is not cleared
If a shave biopsy is performed, a deep shave /saucerization is preferable to obtain full-thickness biopsy of the suspect lesion
In general, I submit all pigmented lesions for permanent section examination and perform definitive surgery later
I generally prefer image-guided fine-needle aspiration or core biopsy as an initial diagnostic maneuver to document nodal or other melanoma metastases, but not to diagnose primary melanomas
Varies according to the anatomical site as well as the size and shape of the lesion
Particular attention should be placed on the impact of the biopsy on definitive surgical treatment
Either an excisional biopsy or an incisional biopsy using a scalpel or punch is acceptable
Entire removal of the lesion is generally preferred to allow for accurate pathologic evaluation
Punch biopsies:
Can be performed for most lesions:
Generally, they can be performed when lesions are located on areas where maximum preservation of surrounding skin is important, or can be completely excised with a punch
Punch biopsies:
Should be performed at the most raised or darkest area of the lesion to sample the most aggressive area of the potential melanoma
Full-thickness biopsy:
Into the subcutaneous tissue should be performed to ensure accurate staging of the lesion
An excisional biopsy:
Allows the pathologist to accurately determine the thickness of the lesion, since the entire lesion is available for evaluation
Excisional biopsies:
Should be performed when the lesion is too large for a punch but still can be removed without excessive surgical intervention
For excisional biopsies:
A narrow margin of normal-appearing skin (1 to 3 mm) is taken with the specimen
An elliptical incision:
Is often used to facilitate closure
The biopsy incision should be oriented to facilitate later wide excision (e.g., axially on extremities) and minimize the need for a skin graft to provide wound closure at the time of wide excision
Shave biopsy:
Is generally discouraged if a diagnosis of melanoma is being considered since incomplete assessment of tumor thickness may result if the deep margin is not cleared
If a shave biopsy is performed:
A deep shave is preferable
In general, I submit all pigmented lesions for permanent section examination and perform definitive surgery at a later time
I generally prefer image-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy as an initial diagnostic maneuver to document nodal or other melanoma metastases:
Melanoma Epidemiology and Sun Exposure. Raimondi S, Suppa M, Gandini S. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 2020;100(11):adv00136. doi:10.2340/00015555-3491. Melanoma. National Library of Medicine (MedlinePlus).
Is a pivotal phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial:
Designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of narrower surgical margins:
For primary cutaneous melanomas that are stage T2b or higher
This trial specifically compares 1-cm margins with the standard 2-cm margins:
To determine if the narrower margin can provide equivalent outcomes in terms of local control and survival
The trial includes patients with primary melanomas thicker than 2 mm (T2b or higher):
It aims to assess whether a 1-cm margin can achieve similar rates of local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival compared to the traditional 2-cm margin
The rationale for this study:
Is based on the hypothesis that narrower margins may reduce surgical morbidity and improve cosmetic outcomes without compromising oncologic safety
The MelMarT-II trial:
Is significant because it addresses the ongoing debate about the optimal surgical margin for thicker melanomas
Previous studies have established that a 2-cm margin is safe for melanomas thicker than 2 mm:
But the potential benefits of a 1-cm margin in terms of reduced morbidity and improved quality of life warrant further investigation
Rodrigo Arrangoiz MS, MD, FACS, FSSO 