- Adjuvant endocrine therapy is evolving:
Oral SERD in early HR+ / HER2− disease:- lidERA (giredestrant vs standard endocrine therapy):
- What it tested:
- Adjuvant giredestrant (oral SERD) vs standard endocrine therapy after surgery in ER+ /HER2− early breast cancer
- What it tested:
- Headline result:
- Significant iDFS improvement:
- They reported ~30% relative risk reduction (HR ~0.70) vs standard ET
- Why it matters:
- First credible signal in a long time that “better endocrine backbone” (beyond AI / tamoxifen) could become standard for selected early HR+ patients:
- Especially if subgroup and safety data remain favorable
- First credible signal in a long time that “better endocrine backbone” (beyond AI / tamoxifen) could become standard for selected early HR+ patients:
- Surgical implication:
- Expect more conversations about systemic escalation / de-escalation:
- For example who truly needs CDK4/6 inhibitors vs a more potent endocrine option
- Expect more conversations about systemic escalation / de-escalation:
- Significant iDFS improvement:
- lidERA (giredestrant vs standard endocrine therapy):
- Post-neoadjuvant HER2+ residual disease:
T-DXd moves earlier:- DESTINY-Breast05 (T-DXd vs T-DM1):
- Population:
- HER2+ early breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy:
- High-risk post-NAC setting
- HER2+ early breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy:
- Key outcome:
- T-DXd superior to T-DM1 for invasive disease-free outcomes
- Reported data (NEJM / PubMed):
- Events 6.4% vs 12.6%, HR 0.47:
- With 3-year DFS 92.3% vs 83.5%
- Events 6.4% vs 12.6%, HR 0.47:
- Why it matters:
- This is a direct “KATHERINE-successor” story:
- If adopted into guidelines / pathways, it could reset the post-neoadjuvant standard for residual HER2+ disease
- This is a direct “KATHERINE-successor” story:
- Surgical implication:
- Reinforces the importance of accurate residual disease documentation (pathology, RCB, nodal status) because this is what triggers the post-NAC systemic pathway
- Population:
- DESTINY-Breast05 (T-DXd vs T-DM1):
- Axillary de-escalation:
Omitting SLNB in selected cN0 patients:- Dutch randomized trial (BOOG 2013-08):
- Design:
- Clinically node-negative (cT1 to cT2), treated with BCS + whole-breast RT, randomized to SLNB vs omission
- Message:
- Regional control / oncologic outcomes were not worse with omission in carefully selected patients, supporting a further step in axillary de-escalation
- SABCS:
- Also highlighted interpretation alongside RT fields (since RT contributes to axillary control)
- Design:
- Practical “surgeon filter”:
- This is not “no axillary surgery for everyone,” but it strengthens the discussion for:
- Older / low-risk, cN0, BCS+RT patients in centers that can replicate selection / imaging rigor
- This is not “no axillary surgery for everyone,” but it strengthens the discussion for:
- Dutch randomized trial (BOOG 2013-08):
- Pre-op staging MRI:
- Routine use questioned in specific early BC subsets:
- Alliance A011104 / ACRIN 6694:
- Population:
- Stage I / II HR-negative early breast cancer
- Result:
- Routine pre-op MRI did not improve key oncologic outcomes
- MD Anderson reported 5-yr locoregional recurrence 6.8% with MRI vs 4.3% without (not favoring MRI)
- Message:
- More evidence that routine MRI may not improve outcomes and can drive additional procedures
- Surgical implication:
- Helps justify a more selective MRI strategy, dense breasts, lobular carcinoma, occult primary, discordant imaging, suspected multicentric disease, rather than reflex MRI for all
- Population:
- Alliance A011104 / ACRIN 6694:
- Routine use questioned in specific early BC subsets:
- Immune priming concept:
- Preoperative RT + pembrolizumab
in HR+ / HER2− (early signal):- TBCRC-053 (P-RAD):
- Concept:
- Short-course preoperative RT (e.g., 24 Gy / 3 fractions) added to pembrolizumab + chemotherapy
- Concept:
- Signal:
- Increased tumor T-cell infiltration and “immune activation” endpoints:
- Hypothesis-generating but compelling
- Increased tumor T-cell infiltration and “immune activation” endpoints:
- Clinical implication:
- Not practice-changing yet, but it’s a blueprint for future trials aiming to convert HR+ tumors into more immunogenic disease
- TBCRC-053 (P-RAD):
- Preoperative RT + pembrolizumab
- DCIS de-escalation reality check:
Tamoxifen-only (no surgery) did not meet safety bar:- LORETTA (JCOG1505):
- Design:
- Single-arm tamoxifen without surgery for selected low-risk ER+ / HER2− DCIS
- Outcome:
- Reported 5-year ipsilateral invasive events exceeded prespecified safety threshold (widely summarized from SABCS)
- Takeaway:
- Supports continued caution:
- Endocrine-only, surgery-free DCIS management should remain investigational / exceptional rather than broadly adopted
- Supports continued caution:
- Design:
- LORETTA (JCOG1505):
- What to say at tumor board (tight synthesis) HR+/HER2−:
- LidERA:
- Suggests a credible pathway toward next-generation endocrine therapy (oral SERD) in early disease
- HER2+ residual disease post-NAC:
- T-DXd > T-DM1 in DESTINY-Breast05 – likely a major sequencing shift as pathways update
- Surgery de-escalation:
- Growing evidence that less axillary surgery and less routine MRI can be safe in well-defined populations
- Translational front:
- Preoperative RT + IO is an emerging strategy to watch, not a standard yet
- DCIS:
- Surgery-free endocrine-only strategies still struggle with invasive recurrence risk thresholds
- LidERA:

