Board-Review–Style Questions on Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer Part 2

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the axilla:
    • Biopsy-proven cN1 starting NAC – what to do before therapy?
      • Clip / mark the positive node to enable targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after NAC
    • After NAC, exam / US cN0 – can SLNB be used? Main concern?
      • Yes:
        • But false-negative rate (FNR) is the issue
      • Use techniques to reduce FNR:
        • Dual tracers
        • ≥ 2 to 3 SLNs
        • Retrieval of the clipped node
    • Z1071 FNR headline and mitigation strategies:
      • Overall FNR about:
        • 12% to 13%
      • ≥ 3 SLNs, dual tracers, and removal of the clipped node lower FNR
    • SENTINA insights:
      • Identification and FNR vary by timing:
        • SLNB after NAC in initially node-positive patients has higher FNR unless optimized
      • SN-FNAC findings:
        • With rigorous pathology (IHC) and adequate technique, FNR can be ≈ 8% to 13%:
          • Still requires careful selection
    • What is TAD and why use it post-NAC?
      • TAD = SLNB + removal of the clipped metastatic node:
        • Improves accuracy and lowers FNR versus SLNB alone
    • If post-NAC axilla remains cN+ clinically or by imaging / biopsy – management?
      • ALND (and consideration of RNI) remains standard
    • Subtype and nodal pCR expectations after NAC:
      • HER2+ and TNBC have higher nodal pCR, supporting de-escalation strategies when cN1→cN0 with optimized technique
    • Do you routinely perform SLNB before NAC in cN0 to “bank” nodes?
      • Not routinely; most proceed with SLNB after NAC in cN0, reserving pre-NAC SLNB for select scenarios
    • If the clipped node is not retrieved at surgery post-NAC but SLNs are negative – what now?
      • Higher FNR concern; many advocate completion ALND or targeted re-localization to ensure the clipped node is removed
  • Radiation interfaces (ASTRO-ASCO-SSO; PMRT/RNI):
    • How do PMRT / RNI guidelines intersect with axillary surgery choices?
      • Updated ASTRO-ASCO-SSO PMRT guidance:
        • Chest wall / breast plus regional nodes (including axilla) are addressed based on pathologic and clinical risk
        • In some SLN+ cases axillary RT may substitute for ALND
        • Z0011 vs regional nodal irradiation (RNI) big picture:
          • Z0011 patients had excellent outcomes with tangents; comprehensive nodal RT can also control axilla but with different toxicity trade-offs
    • After mastectomy with 1 to 3 positive nodes – axillary management?
      • Often PMRT with RNI is recommended
      • ALND may be performed depending on surgical/RT plan and extent of disease
    • Can axillary RT replace ALND for SLN+ in BCS patients (AMAROS principle)?
      • Yes – axillary RT offers comparable control with less lymphedema vs ALND
    • Does omission of SLNB (SOUND / INSEMA) change systemic therapy decisions?
      • In properly selected low-risk cohorts, nodal information rarely changes systemic therapy, enabling safe omission
  • Practical technique and pathology:
    • Minimum SLN count to reduce FNR post-NAC?
      • Try to retrieve ≥ 2 to 3 SLNs:
        • More is better for accuracy
    • Mapping agents: single vs dual tracer?
      • Dual tracer (radioisotope + blue dye / ICG) reduces FNR:
        • Especially post-NAC
    • What to do with ITCs (pN0[i+]) post-NAC?
      • Treat as node-negative for surgical decision-making
      • Escalate RT / systemic therapy only if other factors indicate
    • How do micrometastases (pN1mi) affect ALND decisions in upfront BCS
      • Per IBCSG 23-01:
        • ALND can be omitted with micrometastases
    • Grossly matted / fixed nodes at presentation (cN2 to N3) – initial surgical plan?
      • These patients generally need systemic therapy and ALND (with RNI), not SLNB
  • Special scenarios:
    • Pregnancy and SLNB – allowed?
      • Yes, with Tc-99m only (avoid blue dye anaphylaxis risk; methylene blue contraindicated in 1st trimester):
        • Institutional policies vary. (ASBrS technique guidance)
    • Prior breast / axillary surgery – impact on SLN mapping?
      • Prior surgery / radiation can alter drainage:
        • SLNB still feasible but may have lower identification rates:
          • Consider imaging aid
    • Local recurrence after previous SLNB – repeat SLNB?
      • Possible in selected cases; mapping may identify alternate basins; MDT discussion is key
    • Male breast cancer – apply same axillary algorithms?
      • Generally yes:
        • SLNB for cN0 invasive disease, with similar de-escalation logic when applicable
    • Medullary-like or tubular carcinoma – special SLNB rules?
      • No unique rules:
        • Follow general cN0 invasive management:
          • SLNB unless low-risk omission criteria met
  • Gray zones and decision-making:
    • If genomic assay selection might hinge on nodal status, should you still omit SLNB?
      • If nodal status would alter systemic therapy decisions (e.g., chemotherapy indication):
        • Perform SLNB
      • Omission is for cases where nodal information won’t change therapy
    • How do you counsel about lymphedema risk when comparing SLNB vs ALND vs axillary RT:
      • Lymphedema risk:
        • ALND > axillary RT > SLNB > omission
      • AMAROS shows less lymphedema with RT vs ALND
    • If SLN is positive and patient is not a candidate for whole-breast RT (e.g., declines RT) after BCS – omit ALND
      • Z0011 required WBRT; without RT coverage, many favor ALND
    • Clinically negative axilla but suspicious single node on imaging with benign core biopsy – proceed with SLNB or omit?
      • Proceed with SLNB (or omission only if fully meeting SOUND / ASCO criteria and MDT agrees imaging is truly negative / safe)
  • Bottom line:
  • When is ALND still clearly indicated today?
    • Inflammatory breast cancer
    • Persistent cN+ after NAC
    • >2 SLNs positive in upfront BCS /mastectomy
    • Gross ENE
    • When RT plans won’t cover low axilla
    • Nodal information is needed

Leave a comment