In p16+ Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OPSCC) – Does any Efficacy Endpoint Favor Cetuximab-RT over Cisplatin-RT?

  • In p16+ OPSCC, does any efficacy endpoint favor cetuximab-RT over cisplatin-RT?
    • Best answer: 
      • No
    • Why: 
      • Neither OS, PFS, nor LRC improved with cetuximab:
    • When to deviate: 
      • Only with absolute cisplatin ineligibility PMC:
        • Discuss RT + cetuximab (Bonner) or altered-fractionation RT
    • Pitfalls: 
      • Extrapolating the Bonner 2006 RT + cetuximab vs RT-alone result:
        • To cisplatin-eligible patients is incorrect New England Journal of Medicine
        • Bonner:
          • 5-yr OS 45.6% with RT + cetuximab vs 36.4% RT alone:
            • Not a comparison to cisplatin
      • Under-discussing ototoxicity / renal toxicity risks with cisplatin:
        • Document shared decision-making when deviating
    • Numbers: 
      • RTOG – 1016 (NI trial, Lancet 2019):

        • 5-yr OS:  84.6% cisplatin vs 77.9% cetuximab (non-inferiority failed; cetuximab inferior) 

        • PFS and LRC: both significantly worse with cetuximab (PFS HR ≈ 1.72; LRF HR ≈2.05) Oral Cancer Foundation+1

        •  
      • De-ESCALaTE HPV (Lancet 2019):

        • ~ 2-yr OS:  97.5% cisplatin vs 89.4% cetuximab (HR ~ 5.0)

        • Recurrence: higher with cetuximab (HR ~ 3.4)

        • Severe toxicity rates overall similar — no compensatory safety win. 

Rodrigo Arrangoiz, MD (Oncology Surgeon)

Leave a comment