Bottom line: In carefully selected patients (typically older, ER+/HER2–, node-negative, small tumors on endocrine therapy), skipping whole-breast radiotherapy (RT) raises local recurrence modestly but does not worsen overall survival in long-term randomized data.
Key randomized signals (10-year):
• PRIME II (age ≥65, HR+, ≤3 cm, node-negative, endocrine therapy): local recurrence 9.5% without RT vs 0.9% with RT; no difference in distant recurrence or overall survival (~81% both arms).
• CALGB 9343 (age ≥70, T1N0 ER+): local/regional control higher with RT (98% vs 90%) but no differences in time to mastectomy, distant metastasis, breast cancer-specific survival, or OS (67% vs 66%).
Meta-analytic perspective: Syntheses focused on randomized trials consistently show RT substantially lowers local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery, with minimal or no OS impact in these low-risk cohorts—informing shared decisions when a patient prioritizes avoiding RT toxicity or logistics.
Who may be appropriate to consider for omission?
• Age ≥65–70, ER+, HER2–, pT1, node-negative, clear margins, committed to endocrine therapy; ideally with a reassuring axillary assessment and low-risk biology. (Emerging prospective cohorts like LUMINA/IDEA support expanding biologic selection but are not RCTs.)
Why this matters for patients:
• Fewer visits, less fatigue/dermatitis, and lower long-term toxicity burden—without sacrificing survival in the right subset.
Practical takeaways for clinic:
Discuss omission for the classic low-risk profile above; quote absolute local-recurrence trade-offs (e.g., ~9–10% vs ~1% at 10 years in PRIME II). If RT is preferred or biology is borderline, consider de-escalated RT (partial-breast or 5-fraction regimens) to cut burden while preserving control. Use shared decision-making; align with patient goals, comorbidity, adherence to endocrine therapy, and imaging/pathology risk features.
#BreastCancer #RadiationOncology #Deescalation #SharedDecisionMaking #Oncology
#Arrangoiz
