Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Update 2025

  • Surgical Management of DCIS (2024 to 2025 Update):
    • Re-excision vs Mastectomy:
      • Re-excision is indicated for positive (ink-on-tumor) margins after lumpectomy;
        • Unless specific skin-only or fascia-only circumstances justify margin acceptance:
          • Always document clearly
      • Total mastectomy is appropriate when negative margins cannot be achieved, or if disease is diffuse or multifocal:
        • Most mastectomy patients do not require radiotherapy after DCIS resection
    • Reference:
      • American Cancer Society. Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). accessed June 2025.
    • Reference:
      • American Society of Breast Surgeons. “Margins in Breast Conservation Surgery: Resource Guide.” 2024.
    • Axillary Management:
      • Avoid ALND (axillary lymph node dissection):
        • In pure DCIS without clinical / radiologic evidence of invasion or nodal disease
      • SLNB (sentinel lymph node biopsy):
        • Omit for pure DCIS treated with BCS when there’s no clinical / radiological suspicion of invasion:
          • Nodal involvement is very low
        • Perform or strongly consider if:
          • Mastectomy is planned (because SLNB is not feasible afterward if invasion is unexpectedly found)
          • There’s high suspicion of invasion (e.g., palpable mass, abnormal imaging / biopsy)
          • Excision location could compromise future SLN (upper-outer quadrant /axillary tail)
      • References:
        • American Society of Breast Surgeons, “Management of the Axilla: Position Statement.” 2024.
        • American Cancer Society. Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). accessed June 2025.
        • NCCN-derived peer-reviewed statement, “Strong consideration for SLNB with mastectomy or mapping-compromising locations,” published in Annals of Surgical Oncology (exact citation not available; institutional statement)
      • Emerging data:
        • Older patients ≥ 50 with radiologically normal axilla undergoing mastectomy:
          • Suggest SLNB may be omitted, but this is not yet in guidelines and must be individualized
        • Reference:
          • Madak-Erdogan et al., Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023
    • De-escalation and Active Surveillance:
      • Early results from COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) randomized trial in low-risk DCIS:
        • At 2 years active surveillance ± endocrine therapy yielded non-inferior rates of invasive progression compared to surgery /RT:
          • Patient-reported outcomes are pending
        • Long-term outcomes:
          • Not yet available
        • Active surveillance:
          • Should only be considered within clinical trials or carefully selected settings
      • Reference:
        • Narod et al., Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025; and associated JAMA Oncology report 2025.
  • Margins in DCIS:
    • Standard Adequate Margin:
      • For pure DCIS (and DCIS with microinvasion) treated with BCS plus whole-breast radiotherapy:
        • A negative margin of ≥ 2 mm is recommended:
          • Wider margins do not further reduce ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)
      • Reference:
        • Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. “Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American College of Surgeons consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ.” Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(33):4040–4046.
        • American Society of Breast Surgeons. “Margins in Breast Conservation Surgery: Resource Guide.” 2024.
    • Margin-Width Decision Chart:
      • Ink-positive margins:
        • Re-excision required
          • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • < 2 mm but still negative:
        • With WBRT planned, re-excision generally not required, unless there are complicating features:
          • Multifocality, specimen fragmentation, APBI plans
        • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • ≥ 2 mm:
        • Adequate:
          • No evidence to support further wider excision
        • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • If RT is omitted (e.g., in select older or low-risk patients):
        • Retrospective data suggest wider margins correlate with lower local events:
          • But no definitive guideline threshold exists
          • Document discussions clearly
        • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • Mixed Invasive + DCIS:
        • Treat according to invasive cancer standards:
          • “No ink on tumor” is adequate, even if DCIS is near the edge
        • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • DCIS with Microinvasion (≤ 1 mm):
        • Manage margins like pure DCIS:
          • Aim for ≥ 2 mm margin with whole-breast RT
        • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • Margin Exceptions:
        • Skin-only or fascia-only positive margins after full-thickness excision may be acceptable without re-excision if no residual breast parenchyma remains:
          • Document rationale
        • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), ALH, or classic LCIS at / near the margin:
        • Should not prompt re-excision:
          • Re-excise based solely on DCIS or invasive cancer margins
        • Reference: American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2024.
      • New Evidence (PRECISION Cohort):
        • PRECISION pooled international cohort (≈ 47,000 DCIS cases) demonstrated that:
          • Margins < 2 mm are associated with higher 10-year ipsilateral events compared to ≥ 2 mm, although absolute differences are modest, supporting the 2 mm standard with RT
        • Reference:
          • PRECISION Collaboration. “Margin width and local recurrence in DCIS: pooled analysis of international cohorts.” BMJ. 2023;383:e076022.
          • PRECISION Collaboration. PubMed; PMID 37903527.
  • References:
    • Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American College of Surgeons consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(33):4040–4046.
    • American Society of Breast Surgeons. Margins in Breast Conservation Surgery: Resource Guide. 2024. Available from: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/docs/statements/asbrs-rg-margins.pdf
    • American Society of Breast Surgeons. Management of the Axilla: Position Statement. 2024. Available from: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/docs/statements/management-of-the-axilla.pdf
    • American Cancer Society. Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Accessible via: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/breast-cancer/treatment/…dcis.html (Accessed June 2025).
    • Narod SA, et al. COMET trial early outcomes — active surveillance versus surgery/radiation in low-risk DCIS. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2025.
    • PRECISION Collaboration. Margin width and local recurrence in DCIS: pooled analysis of international cohorts. BMJ. 2023;383:e076022.
    • PRECISION Collaboration. PMID: 37903527.
      Madak-Erdogan Z, et al. Considerations regarding omission of SLNB in selected DCIS mastectomy patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2023.

Leave a comment