PARADIGM and DeCIDE Trials in Head and Neck Cancer

  • Background:
    • Both PARADIGM and DeCIDE were phase III randomized trials that evaluated the role of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiation versus chemoradiation alone:
      • In patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
  • Trial Findings:
    • PARADIGM Trial (Haddad et al., 2013):
      • Compared IC (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU) followed by CRT vs. CRT alone
      • No overall survival (OS) benefit was seen for the IC arm
      • The control arm (CRT alone) performed better than expected:
        • Narrowing potential differences
      • Trial closed early due to poor accrual (145 patients instead of 300+ planned)
    • DeCIDE Trial (Cohen et al., 2014):
      • Also tested induction chemotherapy followed by CRT vs. CRT alone in advanced HNSCC with high-risk features
      • It failed to show significant improvement in OS or progression-free survival (PFS)
      • Similar to PARADIGM, poor accrual and favorable outcomes in the control arm limited conclusions
  • Key Takeaways for Surgeons:
    • Negative Results:
      • Neither trial demonstrated a survival advantage for adding induction chemotherapy before CRT
    • Reasons for Negativity:
      • Poor accrual:
        • Underpowered to detect meaningful differences
      • Unexpectedly favorable outcomes in control arms:
        • CRT alone did better than historical benchmarks
    • Clinical Implication:
      • CRT alone remains the standard of care for most patients with locally advanced HNSCC:
        • IC is not routinely recommended outside of select cases:
          • Organ preservation
          • Laryngeal /hypopharyngeal cancers
          • Where rapid tumor shrinkage is needed
    • Ongoing Relevance:
      • These trials highlight the challenges of large cooperative studies in HNSCC and the importance of accrual in detecting real benefits
  • Summary Sentence:
    • The PARADIGM and DeCIDE trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit for induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer:
      • Largely due to poor accrual and unexpectedly strong results in the control arms:
        • Confirming that CRT alone remains the standard of care for most patients

Leave a comment