- Overview:
- The evolution from routinely performing total thyroidectomy (TT) to more selective use of thyroid lobectomy (TL) in DTC:
- Reflects growing evidence that low- and select intermediate-risk patients can achieve equivalent oncologic outcomes with less morbidity
- The evolution from routinely performing total thyroidectomy (TT) to more selective use of thyroid lobectomy (TL) in DTC:
- Key Historical and Modern Data:
- Historical Basis for Total Thyroidectomy:
- Mazzaferri & Young (1981, Am J Med):
- Retrospective analysis:
- Patients who underwent TT had better recurrence-free survival and lower disease-specific mortality
- Study limitations:
- Included many patients with advanced disease and used pre-ATA classification systems
- Reference:
- Mazzaferri EL, Young RL. Am J Med. 1981;70(3):511–518.
- Retrospective analysis:
- Shift Toward Risk-Adapted, Less Extensive Surgery:
- Bilimoria et al. (2007, Ann Surg) – NCDB Study:
- 52,000 PTC patients:
- TT associated with better survival in tumors > 1 cm
- Limitations:
- Retrospective, confounded by extent of disease
- Reference:
- Bilimoria KY, et al. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):471–479
- 52,000 PTC patients:
- Adam et al. (2014, J Clin Oncol) – NCDB Analysis:
- 61,775 patients with 1 to 4 cm tumors:
- No overall survival benefit for TT over TL
- Supported shift toward more conservative surgery in low-risk DTC
- Reference:
- Adam MA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(23):2000–2005.
- 61,775 patients with 1 to 4 cm tumors:
- Nixon et al. (2012, Ann Surg) – MSKCC Experience:
- 889 patients with PTC < 4 cm, no extrathyroidal extension or lymph node metastasis:
- No difference in recurrence or survival between TL and TT
- Reference:
- Nixon IJ, et al. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):518–520
- 889 patients with PTC < 4 cm, no extrathyroidal extension or lymph node metastasis:
- Prospective Trials and Systematic Reviews:
- Japanese Prospective Data – Sugitani et al:
- Prospective follow-up of TL in low-risk PTC (≤ 4 cm):
- Low recurrence and excellent survival
- Reference:
- Sugitani I, et al. World J Surg. 2010;34(6):1215–1221.
- Prospective follow-up of TL in low-risk PTC (≤ 4 cm):
- Jeon et al. (2017, J Clin Endocrinol Metab):
- Matched cohort study, 3,444 patients with 1 to 2 cm tumors:
- No difference in recurrence-free survival or disease-specific survival
- Reference:
- Jeon MJ, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(6):1965–1972
- Matched cohort study, 3,444 patients with 1 to 2 cm tumors:
- Sanabria et al. (2020, Cochrane Review):
- Meta-analysis:
- No survival benefit of TT over TL in tumors ≤ 4 cm without ETE or lymph node metastasis
- Higher complication rates with TT
- Reference:
- Sanabria A, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12:CD012703
- Meta-analysis:
- Japanese Prospective Data – Sugitani et al:
- Complication Rates:
- TT carries a higher risk of permanent hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury:
- 30% to 40% transient and 1% to 3% permanent hypoparathyroidism
- Higher reoperation risk for contralateral disease post-TL, but lower surgical morbidity initially
- TT carries a higher risk of permanent hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury:
- ATA 2015 Guidelines (Current as of 2025):
- Recommendations:
- Tumors < 1 cm (T1a):
- Active surveillance or TL
- Tumors 1cm to 4 cm (T1b to T2):
- No aggressive features (ETE, nodal metastases, poor histology, vascular invasion):
- TL is sufficient
- No aggressive features (ETE, nodal metastases, poor histology, vascular invasion):
- If aggressive features present or bilateral disease suspected:
- TT recommended.
- > 4 cm tumors, bilateral disease, gross ETE, clinical N1, distant mets:
- TT preferred
- Reference:
- Haugen BR, et al. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133
- Tumors < 1 cm (T1a):
- Recommendations:
- Bilimoria et al. (2007, Ann Surg) – NCDB Study:
- Mazzaferri & Young (1981, Am J Med):
- Historical Basis for Total Thyroidectomy:
- Emerging Data / Future Directions:
- Upcoming 2025 ATA Guidelines may further support TL in more intermediate-risk patients, especially with molecular profiling and personalized risk stratification
- Role of genomics and molecular markers (e.g., BRAF, TERT, RAS) in guiding extent of surgery is under investigation
- Conclusions:
- Thyroid lobectomy is oncologically safe in selected patients with low-risk DTC (unifocal, ≤ 4 cm, cN0, no ETE or aggressive histology)
- Total thyroidectomy remains necessary for high-risk features, RAI candidates, or bilateral disease
- The trend is toward individualized, risk-adapted surgical strategies balancing recurrence risk with surgical morbidity
- References:
- Mazzaferri EL, Young RL. Am J Med. 1981;70(3):511–518.
- Bilimoria KY, et al. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):471–479.
- Adam MA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(23):2000–2005.
- Nixon IJ, et al. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):518–520.
- Sugitani I, et al. World J Surg. 2010;34(6):1215–1221.
- Jeon MJ, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(6):1965–1972.
- Sanabria A, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12:CD012703.
- Haugen BR, et al. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133.

