Use of Radioactive Iodine for Thyroid Cancer – NCDB and SEER Data

  • Study Overview:
    • Citation:
      • Haymart MR, Banerjee M, Stewart AK, Koenig RJ, Birkmeyer JD, Griggs JJ. Use of radioactive iodine for thyroid cancer. JAMA. 2011;306(7):721–728. 
    • Type:
      • Observational cohort using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and SEER registries from 2004 to 2008
    • Population:
      • 189,219 adult patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (papillary or follicular) who underwent total thyroidectomy at 981 U.S. cancer centers
    • Objectives:
      • Analyze trends in RAI usage from 1990 to 2008
      • Identify patient-, tumor-, and hospital-level predictors of RAI administration
      • Assess variation in use across centers, adjusted for disease severity
  • Key Findings:
    • Rising Use Over Time
    • RAI utilization increased significantly across all tumor sizes between 1990 and 2008
    • Variation Driven by Non-Clinical Factors
    • Patient / tumor characteristics explained ~21% of variation in RAI use
    • Hospital traits (type, volume) accounted for ~17%, and 29% remained unexplained, suggesting practice pattern influence
  • Disease Stage and Use:
    • Compared to Stage IV:
      • Patients with Stage I disease were much less likely to receive RAI (OR 0.34), but Stage II / III use was similar to Stage IV (OR ~1)
  • Regional Disparities:
    • Rate of RAI use for low-, medium-, and high-risk disease varied by region (49% to 66%):
      • Indicating inconsistency in treatment approaches 
  • Clinical Implications:
    • Overuse concern:
      • Increasing RAI use even in low-risk settings raises questions about overtreatment
    • Practice patterns matter:
      • Institutional priorities and physician preferences strongly influenced whether patients received RAI, beyond tumor biology
    • Guideline alignment needed:
      • The lack of deficit-stage conformity highlights a need to standardize RAI delivery based on risk stratification, not provider bias
    • Takeaway for Expert Surgeons:
      • Recognize that RAI is often employed inconsistently, even for Stage II to III disease, despite limited evidence of benefit in these groups
      • Encourage benchmarking and quality initiatives within institutions to ensure RAI administration aligns with ATA risk-based guidelines
      • Educate multidisciplinary teams that evidence-based risk stratification should dictate RAI use, minimizing unnecessary exposure for patients with lower-stage disease

Leave a comment