BRAF Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma

  • BRAF mutations:
    • Have been found in approximately 50% of invasive cutaneous melanomas
  • The BRAF gene:
    • Encodes for production of B-RAF:
      • A protein involved in cell signaling and growth
  • BRIM-3:
    • Was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study
    • It compared a BRAF inhibitor, PLX4032 (vemurafenib), to dacarbazine:
      • For treatment of previously untreated, unresectable, stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma in patients harboring a BRAF mutation
    • The inhibitor targets the common V600E BRAF mutation
    • Interim analysis of 675 patients revealed:
      • Superiority in OS and PFS for vemurafenib
      • The response rate of patients on vemurafenib:
        • Was 48.4% compared to 5.5% for patients receiving dacarbazine
      • While such a response rate for single modality therapy was essentially unprecedented in the treatment of metastatic melanoma:
        • Enthusiasm was tempered, at least to some extent, by the observation that disease recurrence was observed in the majority of patients 6 to 8 months following initiation of therapy
      • Also important was the observation that up to 25% of patients who received vemurafenib developed squamous carcinoma of the skin:
        • Often in the form of keratoacanthomas
  • Dabrafenib, another agent targeting BRAF V600 mutant melanoma:
    • Demonstrated similarly high OR rates in a phase III trial
  • Together, these findings provided the basis for approval of each of these agents as monotherapy in 2011 and 2013, respectively
  • MEK, a kinase downstream of RAF in the MAPK pathway, has been targeted in a similar fashion:
    • MEK inhibitors demonstrated benefit as monotherapy in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma:
      • Leading to the FDA approval of trametinib in 2013
    • Of note, MEK inhibitors are rarely used as monotherapy for patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma
  • Numerous studies have elucidated acquired mechanisms of therapeutic resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy, and insights gained have led to treatment strategies to enhance responses to therapy:
    • An outcome of this is the use of combined BRAF and MEK inhibition:
      • Based on the observation that most BRAF-mutant melanomas demonstrate MAPK pathway reactivation at the time of therapeutic resistance
    • This combination was tested in clinical trials in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma:
      • Results demonstrated that treatment with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition (e.g., dabrafenib plus trametinib vs. dabrafenib monotherapy):
        • Was associated with:
          • A higher overall response (76% vs. 54%), and with a longer PFS (9.4 months vs. 5.8 months) than with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy
      • In January 2014, the FDA granted accelerated approval to combined dabrafenib and trametinib for use in combination in patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma
    • The following year, the FDA also approved the BRAF / MEK inhibitor combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib (coBRIM study), and in 2018, encorafenib and binimetinib were added to the armamentarium (COLUMBUS trial)
    • Importantly, neither BRAF inhibitor nor MEK inhibitor monotherapy is currently deployed in the current melanoma treatment landscape
    • It should also be noted that BRAF inhibitors have been shown to paradoxically stimulate growth in patients with wild-type BRAF status
    • The COMBI-MB clinical trial enrolled patients with melanoma brain metastases to receive dabrafenib and trametinib:
      • Across four patient cohorts, intracranial response ranged from 44% to 59%, although duration of response was relatively short:
        • As such, many medical oncologists prefer to use immunotherapy for brain metastases even in BRAF positive patients given the short duration of benefit with targeted therapy

Leave a comment