• The long-awaited B51 has been published. A study that opens door, but doesn’t close them all. Should we irradiate nodal areas in cN1 patients who achieve ypN0 after NAC?
  • Evidence might be solid to omit RNI in HER2+ patients with good response. This group appears to be the most promising.
  • The triple-negative cohort shows a puzzling signal: higher risk with irradiation. Statistical noise? Selection bias? Serendipity?
  • In pure luminal cases—5% in practice but only 20% in the trial there’s a trend toward benefit with RNI.
  • Limited follow-up, low representation, and no data on grade or LVI make it hard to change practice based on this evidence.
  • Also, I wonder if this was actually two studies in one:
    • In mastectomy, it’s all or nothing—irradiate everything or nothing at all.
    • In breast-conserving surgery, it’s about adding or omitting RNI from standard treatment.
  • B51 is a step toward personalized treatment but not the final word.
  • Sometimes, less is not less—but more.
  • Yet omission must always be thoughtful.

Leave a comment