- In accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines:
- Patients that converted from clinically node positive to negative on both physical exam and imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy:
- Are candidates for targeted axillary dissection (TAD)
- Patients that converted from clinically node positive to negative on both physical exam and imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy:
- In order to minimize the false negative rate of TAD:
- It is important to retrieve the:
- Clipped malignant axillary lymph node and also perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)
- It is important to retrieve the:
- Data from ACOSOG Z1071 and MD Anderson Cancer Center:
- Demonstrated false negative rates greater than approximately 10% to 20% with SLNB alone
- These rates decreased to nearly 1% to 7%:
- With the addition of a directed retrieval of the initially malignant axillary lymph node
- Despite the excellent response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on exam and imaging:
- There is no data to support non-operative management of the axilla in this patient who presented with regionally advanced invasive breast cancer
- Unlike with an upfront surgery approach:
- Any residual disease in the axillary lymph nodes after NACT:
- Warrants completion level I / II axillary lymph node dissection:
- In fact, studies have shown rates of additional axillary disease:
- Ranging from about 30% to 60% in patients with residual micrometastases after NACT
- These rates are greater than the residual axillary disease rate in ACOSOG Z0011 and also suggest disease that is resistant to systemic therapy and in need of regional control
- In fact, studies have shown rates of additional axillary disease:
- Warrants completion level I / II axillary lymph node dissection:
- Any residual disease in the axillary lymph nodes after NACT:
- There is no role for random sampling of additional level one axillary lymph nodes
- Furthermore, while nomograms exist to predict the probability of detecting additional positive non-sentinel lymph nodes in this setting and occasionally special circumstances exist that warrant discussion of results with the patient and one’s colleagues before moving forward:
- Completion level I / II ALND at the time of the index surgery remains the standard of care
- The results of Alliance 11202:
- A randomized phase III trial comparing axillary lymph node dissection to axillary radiation in breast cancer patients (cT1 to cT3, cN1) who have positive sentinel lymph node disease after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy will help address the question of whether regional node irradiation is equivalent to cALND plus regional node radiation with respect to recurrence-free survival
- It should also be noted that the OPBC-04 /Eubreast-06 study:
- Examined oncologic outcomes following omission of axillary lymph node dissection in node positive patients downstaging to node negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Axillary recurrence after omission of ALND in patients who successfully downstage from N+ to ypN0 with NAC is a rare event following both SLNB or TAD, and was not significantly different between those who underwent a TAD versus SLNB
- The 3-year axillary recurrence rate was less than 1% with TAD or SLNB, while locoregional recurrence at 3 and 5 years was 1.5% and 2.7%, respectively, in all patients and did not differ significantly with the two strategies of lymph node re-staging
- Furthermore, when the SLNB procedure is optimized with dual tracer and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs, the clipped node is an SLN in the majority of cases:
- Suggesting that failure to retrieve the clipped node should not be an indication for ALND
- References
- Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, et al. Identification and Resection of Clipped Node Decreases the False-negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Patients Presenting With Node-positive Breast Cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg. Apr 2016;263(4):802-7. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001375
- Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection. J Clin Oncol. Apr 01 2016;34(10):1072-8. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0094
- Moo TA, Edelweiss M, Hajiyeva S, et al. Is Low-Volume Disease in the Sentinel Node After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy an Indication for Axillary Dissection? Ann Surg Oncol. Jun 2018;25(6):1488-1494. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6429-2
- Weiss A, King C, Vincuilla J, et al. Rates of pathologic nodal disease among cN0 and cN1 patients undergoing routine axillary ultrasound and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Sep 2022;195(2):181-189. doi:10.1007/s10549-022-06677-2
- Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. Feb 9 2011;305(6):569-75. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.90
- Montagna G, Lee MK, Sevilimedu V, Barrio AV, Morrow M. Is Nodal Clipping Beneficial for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6133-6139. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12240-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28. PMID: 35902495; PMCID: PMC10109537.

