Expander / Implant Breast Reconstruction Complication Rate

  • Expander / implant breast reconstruction:
    • Has been shown to have a lower risk of overall complication compared to autologous reconstruction techniques:
      • According Bennet et al:
        • The overall complication rate for breast reconstruction was 33%
  • Expander / implant reconstruction:
    • Had the lowest risk at 26.6% compared to autologous flap techniques:
      • Which were reported to have complication rates of 36% to 74%
  • When the autologous techniques are compared:
    • The fTRAM flap had the lowest risk of complication:
      • At 35.8%
  • Latissimus dorsi flap was found to have complication rate of 39.4%:
    • Followed by pTRAM at 41.2%
  • The technique with the highest risk of complications were deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap at 47.4%, and the superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator flap at 74%
  • References
    • Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):891-899.
    • Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG. Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):901-908.
    • Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Kim JY, Greco RJ, Qi J, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: one-year outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) study. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):164-170.
    • Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2265-2274.

Leave a comment