Variant of Unknown Significance (VUS) In Hereditary Breast Cancer Tests

  • When patients are told they have a variant of unknown significance (VUS):
    • It can often lead to anxiety and overtreatment
  • It is important to counsel patients that a VUS:
    • Is not clinically actionable and the majority of VUS are reclassified as benign
  • Patients should be counseled to update their genetic counselors as their family history changes and keep contact information up to date as variant reclassification does occur
  • The American College of Medical Genetics has recommended that genetic testing classify genetic variants using the following classification schema:
    • Deleterious (pathogenic)
    • Suspected deleterious (likely pathogenic)
    • Variant of Uncertain Clinical Significance
    • Genetic variant, favor polymorphism (likely benign)
    • Polymorphism (benign)
  • While deleterious and suspected deleterious mutations of BRCA mutations:
    • Are known to be associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer:
      • It is unknown whether a BRCA VUS mutation is associated with an increased risk due to limited available data
      • As the use of genetic testing increases and as more of the population is tested, the knowledge base regarding variant pathogenicity constantly grows
  • Given the amount of data available from many years of BRCA1 / BRCA 2 testing:
    • The prevalence of VUS among this population has declined to 2% to 5%:
      • However, among moderate and low penetrance genes:
        • The number of VUS continues to rise
      • As the data expand and knowledge regarding a variant evolves, a variant may be reclassified
  • In a study reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association:
    • 25.4% of patients initially diagnosed with a VUS were reclassified over a 12-year period
    • Of these patients, 97% were downgraded to benign or likely benign
    • Three percent of patients were upgraded to pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants
  • Given this low risk of reclassification to pathogenic mutation, risk-reducing mastectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, or genetic testing of family members are not indicated for this patient
  • There is currently no established effective screening protocol for pancreatic cancer, even among patients with a deleterious BRCA 2 mutation
  • References:
    • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-424.
    • Hall MJ, Reid JE, Burbidge LA, Pruss D, Deffenbaugh AM, Frye C, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(10):2222-2233.
    • Mersch J, Brown N, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Mundt E, Cox HC, Brown K, et al. Prevalence of variant reclassification following hereditary cancer genetic testing. JAMA. 2018;320(12):1266-1274.
#Arrangoiz #Doctor #Surgeon #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #BreastSurgeon #MountSinaiMedicalCenter #MSMC #Miami #Mexico #BreastCancer #VariantofUnknownSignificance #VUS

Leave a comment