- Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC):
- Can decrease the size of a primary tumor to allow for breast conservation, eliminate nodal metastasis in some patients, and provide prognostic information:
- The optimal timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients treated with NAC has been controversial
- Can decrease the size of a primary tumor to allow for breast conservation, eliminate nodal metastasis in some patients, and provide prognostic information:
- Clinical staging of the axilla with SLNB:
- Is feasible both before and after chemotherapy
- SLNB prior to NAC:
- May be a more accurate approach than after NAC
- Chemotherapy:
- May alter lymphatic drainage through fibrosis of lymphatic channels:
- Decreasing the accuracy of SLNB
- May alter lymphatic drainage through fibrosis of lymphatic channels:
- SLNB before NAC has a lower false negative rate and provides more accurate staging:
- Which could determine radiation fields
- Unfortunately, SLNB prior to NAC:
- Requires an additional operation
- Could delay the initiation of chemotherapy
- Fails to decrease the rate of ALND
- It also given by the effect of chemotherapy on axillary metastasis
- These concerns have led to interest in performing SLNB after NAC
- Several recent prospective trials have examined the accuracy of SLNB after NAC:
- The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071:
- Enrolled women with T0 to T4, N1 to N2 clinical disease:
- Who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- All patients underwent pre-NAC axillary needle biopsy
- Forty-one percent of patients had a:
- Pathologic complete response in the axilla
- After chemotherapy:
- Patients underwent both SLNB and ALND
- A sentinel lymph node could not be identified:
- In 7% of patients
- The overall false negative rate was 13%:
- Which did not meet the preset target of 10%
- The false negative rate was 21% in patients with two or fewer sentinel lymph nodes identified:
- But dropped to 9.1%:
- When greater than three sentinel lymph nodes were sampled
- But dropped to 9.1%:
- Enrolled women with T0 to T4, N1 to N2 clinical disease:
- In the Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (SENTINA) trial:
- 1,022 patients underwent SLNB before NAC:
- With a detection rate of 99%
- For patients who were evaluated after NAC and converted from cN+ to ycN0:
- The sentinel lymph node detection rate was only 80%:
- With a false negative rate of 14.2%
- The sentinel lymph node detection rate was only 80%:
- As seen in ACOSOG Z1071:
- The false negative rate:
- Was much higher in patients with only one node removed (24%):
- Than in those with three or more sentinel nodes removed (7%)
- Was much higher in patients with only one node removed (24%):
- The false negative rate:
- The false negative rate was also improved:
- By the use of radiocolloid and blue dye together:
- Compared with blue dye alone:
- False negative rate of 9% versus 16%
- Compared with blue dye alone:
- By the use of radiocolloid and blue dye together:
- 1,022 patients underwent SLNB before NAC:
- The Sentinel Node Biopsy following NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy (SN FNAC) study:
- Enrolled patients with T0 to T3 with N1 to N2 biopsy-proven breast cancer treated with NAC
- Following chemotherapy, patients underwent clinical and ultrasound examination followed by SLNB and completion ALND
- The overall post-NAC SLNB false negative rate was:
- 8% in 153 patients
- When only one sentinel lymph node was evaluated:
- The false negative rate was again unacceptably high:
- At 20%
- The false negative rate was again unacceptably high:
- The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071:
- On the basis of these three trials:
- Resecting only one sentinel node:
- Is associated with an unacceptably high false negative rate
- The false negative rate after NAC may be lowered with the use of:
- Dual tracers and resecting three or more sentinel nodes
- Placing clips in positive lymph nodes before chemotherapy:
- Decreases the false negative rate:
- If the clipped node is then resected during SLNB
- Decreases the false negative rate:
- The sentinel lymph node identification rate after NAC:
- Is significantly improved with increased surgeon experience:
- Suggesting that a learning curve is needed to obtain accurate SLNB after NAC
- Is significantly improved with increased surgeon experience:
- Resecting only one sentinel node:
- SLNB after NAC:
- Has the potential to decrease the number of women who receive ALND
- A study of 288 prospectively identified clinically node-positive patients:
- Reported that 132 became clinically node negative after NAC
- The clinically node-negative patients were then eligible for SLNB:
- 48% had negative sentinel lymph nodes and were able to avoid an ALND
- Current ASCO recommendations state that:
- SLNB should be offered to patients who have received preoperative neoadjuvant systemic therapy and have clinically negative lymph nodes:
- However, no large studies have examined local recurrence rates or survival:
- When ALND is omitted in patients who convert from node positive to node negative after NAC
- The safety of avoiding ALND in these patients:
- Has not been demonstrated
- However, no large studies have examined local recurrence rates or survival:
- SLNB should be offered to patients who have received preoperative neoadjuvant systemic therapy and have clinically negative lymph nodes:
- The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B51 and Alliance A011202 are two sister studies:
- Examining the role of SLNB, ALND, and nodal radiation in patients who receive NAC
- The results of these trials will help identify patients who can safely avoid ALND after NAC

#Arrangoiz #BreastSurgeon #BreastExpert #BreastCancer #CancerSurgeon #SurgicalOncologist #MountSinaiMedicalCenter #MSMC #Miami #Mexico #SLNM #SLNB #SentinelLymphNodeBiospy